Re: ' You invent the script and then you act it out.'

But this is equating the idea of fiction with the idea of a plan. So, what
is not fictional = what is not planned?

The term fiction I agree is an elusive one, but I took it that it was being
contrasted with the idea of the real or the true.

DA



.On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 12:39 AM, William Conger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> Even your conscious thought processes are fictional,
> make-believe.  You invent an ongoing script, as it
> were, of those chaotic moment to moment experiences,
> sorting them and inventing your nxt moment raction and
> action, providing yourself a basic coherence.  You
> invent the script and then you act it out.  You can
> test this easily.  Go to the corner and prepare to
> cross the street.  After you make it to the other side
> reflect on the thought processes you had, what you
> allowed in consciousness and what you excluded
> (similar acceptance and rejection may occur
> unconsciously too).  You quickly realize that you
> invented a fairly succinct script, predicting what
> will happen as you make decisions, and ignoring a
> plethora of other events you might have focussed on
> had you other interests in mind, such as noticing what
> birds may be flying above.  In this sense at least our
> processing of experiences is not unlike the
> "composition" in artworks.  So I don't think we can
> isolate the coherence of composition as a
> distinguishing feature of art, unless we say daily
> life experience, the way we process it and create
> fictional scripts to play out, are art as well.
>
> WC
>
>
> --- Derek Allan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Re  "And that's probably why Derek challenged it --
> > since even if a
> > Raskolnikov never existed -- the story about him
> > might be considered
> > important because something about his psychology is
> > felt to be very real."
> >
> > Yes exactly.
> >
> > It's arguable in fact that our everyday experiences
> > are so chaotic - so
> > formless and lacking in consistency - that, while
> > they may be real enough in
> > terms of their consequences (they affect what we
> > actually do), they never
> > possess the kind of clarity and apprehensibility
> > they achieve in a work of
> > art. So in a sense they only become real   i.e.
> > distinct and fully described
> > - in a work of art.
> >
> > So, claiming that all art depends on fiction (and it
> > is a common enough
> > claim   eg one well known contemporary aesthetician,
> > whose name I have
> > temporarily forgotten, argues that all art depends
> > on 'make believe') seems
> > a fairly superficial observation to me.  What in the
> > end is 'real' in the
> > realm of human experience?  What we encounter in
> > everyday life?  Or the form
> > it takes in art?
> >
> > --
> > Derek Allan
> >
> http://www.home.netspeed.com.au/derek.allan/default.htm
> >
> >
> > On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 1:34 AM, Chris Miller
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Brady's notion of "fictional" would seem to be
> > awkwardly replaceable by a
> > > phrase like "not relevant to reality claims" -- as
> > a sports broadcast
> > > would
> > > be("did he really catch the ball inbounds?" --
> > "did the Niners really
> > > win?")
> > >
> > > And that's probably why Derek challenged it --
> > since even if a Raskolnikov
> > > never existed -- the story about him might be
> > considered important because
> > > something about his psychology is felt to be very
> > real.
> > >
> > > Which also might account for Derek's additional
> > challenge:
> > > "I am trying to pretend this discussion of sport
> > on a philosophy of art
> > > list
> > > is not happening."
> > >
> > > And I also feel that there's something dreadful
> > about emphasizing the
> > > similarity between great moments in sports with
> > the performances of
> > > Shakespeare.
> > >
> > > I suppose there's no doubting that Cheerskep feels
> > like he has an AE with
> > > both
> > > of them -- but unless we can determine some
> > special quality about that
> > > Shakespeare AE -- well, what's the point of
> > telling kids to study great
> > > literature --- when any jackass can go to the
> > ballpark and have a great
> > > time?
> > >
> >
> _____________________________________________________________
> > > Click to get a free auto insurance quotes from top
> > companies.
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2211/fc/Ioyw6ijmNj8KEugM29E9wmEKphl5A8
> > >
> >
> 6jZnxH47rOQIDv1WUjDC3JrO/?count=1234567890<
> http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.ne
> >
>
> t/TGL2211/fc/Ioyw6ijmNj8KEugM29E9wmEKphl5A86jZnxH47rOQIDv1WUjDC3JrO/?count=12
> > 34567890>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> <http://www.home.netspeed.com.au/derek.allan/default.htm>
>
>


-- 
Derek Allan
http://www.home.netspeed.com.au/derek.allan/default.htm

Reply via email to