Re: 'I'm not suggesting that your judgment of art/non-art should have
any criteria,
Derek. (mine don't -- except post-facto).'
So what are they post facto?
RE:' I'm just noting that criteria -- or any other kind of embodiment -- wasn't
> there when you were thinking about whether those Goya prints were art or
> not.'
Once I was thinking whether these were works of art or not, the
necessary words for that thought would need to have been available to
me.
Those weren't wordless thoughts. Not that I spent a lot of time
deliberating whether these were works of art or not. I was too busy
just looking at them - in many cases fascinated.
The one I am about to put on Picasa I saw in Madrid I think. Amazing.
DA
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 4:36 AM, Chris Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not suggesting that your judgment of art/non-art should have any criteria,
> Derek. (mine don't -- except post-facto).
>
> I'm just noting that criteria -- or any other kind of embodiment -- wasn't
> there when you were thinking about whether those Goya prints were art or not.
>
> And I'm offering this as an example of wordless thought that is held to be
> very important -- or, at least important enough to set up your next argument
> ("since the Goya prints *are* art, then......etc etc")
> _____________________________________________________________
> It's never too old to date. Senior Dating. Click Here.
> http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2211/fc/Ioyw6ijn3D5ACeA483rwXBYWSMWs6E
> lVrIYoobFr5BraglKd6FeDd2/?count=1234567890
>
>
--
Derek Allan
http://www.home.netspeed.com.au/derek.allan/default.htm
