On Apr 29, 2009, at 8:25 AM, Michael Brady wrote:
I understand this, but we part company at the "There's art" moment.
My experience is that, like you, I have the buzzer constantly on,
but when only when I see something that I rapidly *and
provisionally* declare to be "art-qualified" do I apply "artistic
criteria" to it. Aesthetic qualities can be perceived in things that
I do not call "art," such as manufactured product, type and
typography, clothing, living things, landscapes (terrain).
I apologize. Somehow, a line got dropped before I sent this message.
After this paragraph, it should read:
Let me try another analogy, in two parts and two versions:
A.
1. You and I are talking. I want to give you directions to some
other place. I point out there, then to the left, to the right, and
The rest is okay.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Michael Brady
[email protected]
