If one becomes a curator, the work invariably reflects the one's
personal taste. The expertise quality only means that the choices
they may make are broader between two aesthetically subjective
points, what do you think?
mando
On Nov 14, 2009, at 10:45 AM, Chris Miller wrote:
What about the other part of my question, Mando?
Do you think it requires any kind of expertise to curate exhibits
in an art
museum, and if so, how can that expertise be determined?
......................................................................
.......
...
My original feeling from day one, is that teachers get in the way of
creativity, specially those with the most success. Perhaps true
philosophers
in aesthetics would make better teachers of art.
The area where, in aesthetics, all art exists,regardless of taste.
Where we
all perceive the essence of all things, individually differently,
is a Gold
Mine ,Why would teachers want to direct that, in individual
creativity by
teaching the
successful path of others and discouraging one's individual taste.
I think art was never made to be taught or controlled be
anyone,except by the
freedom of each individual's will to make their own path.
mando
____________________________________________________________
Hotel
Taking a trip? Click here to compare hotel rates and find a great
deal.
http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2231/c?
cp=f5TmTAy1IP7e9UodHlsgJwAAJz6c
l_zTaptgNR5c8Mer1v9kAAYAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAADNAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAATRAAAAA
A=
