I thought every individual was combination of his/hers experiences, and no two could possibly be alike.
AB ________________________________ From: William Conger <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2012 3:31 PM Subject: Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? No I mean the artist himself is not fully himself any more than anyone can be a single identity. The artist is filled with an amalgam of others, real, dead, imaginary. In the 19C G. Courbet made a huge painting titled the Artist in His studio. Take a look at it. wc ----- Original Message ---- From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Sun, March 18, 2012 5:12:03 PM Subject: Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? In a message dated 3/18/12 4:46:49 PM, [email protected] writes: > There's always a passive editor in the studio. > wc > If you mean the creator himself, I agree.
