Art will always exist between the two extremes of good or bad. ab On Aug 15, 2012, at 1:03 AM, joseph berg wrote:
> - Many before have tried to establish criteria for art, and the only > theories that could be called successful have been so vague as to be nearly > useless or so complex as to almost defy understanding. The alternative, of > course, is to say that art is anything the maker says that it is. I am > already on record as being absolutely opposed to this view. > > http://unnaturallight.com/2012/01/23/a-new-set-of-criteria-for-contemporary-a rt/ > > > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 12:32 AM, joseph berg <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Isn't an aesthetic criteria supposed to help prevent style from overcoming >> (obliterating?) substance?: >> >> - Harrison Ford has taken a swipe at action films that rely too much on >> special effects calling them "soulless". >> >> >> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/8546869/Harrison-Ford-criticises-soul less-action-films.html
