Here's a nice rule to settle certain disputes. "I stipulate if it's in Webster's Third it's a word." But suppose it isn't in The American Heritage Dictionary? Stipulated rules and ontic statuses are wholly mental concoctions. They can't create "real" heavens, angels, words, or mind-independent meanings.
- Can art continue to exist without an aesthetic criteria? joseph berg
- Re: Can art continue to exist without an aesthetic cri... ARMANDO BAEZA
- Re: Can art continue to exist without an aesthetic... joseph berg
- Re: Can art continue to exist without an aesth... ARMANDO BAEZA
- Re: Can art continue to exist without an aesthetic cri... joseph berg
- Re: Can art continue to exist without an aesthetic cri... joseph berg
- Re: Can art continue to exist without an aesthetic... William Conger
- Re: Can art continue to exist without an aesthetic... armando baeza
- Re: Can art continue to exist without an aesthetic cri... Cheerskep
- Re: Can art continue to exist without an aesthetic... Michael Brady
- Re: Can art continue to exist without an aesth... William Conger
- Re: Can art continue to exist without an aesthetic cri... Cheerskep
- Re: Can art continue to exist without an aesthetic... Michael Brady
- Re: Can art continue to exist without an aesth... William Conger
- Re: Can art continue to exist without an a... Michael Brady
- Re: Can art continue to exist without... William Conger
- Re: Can art continue to exist wit... Michael Brady
- Re: Can art continue to exist without an aesthetic... armando baeza
- Re: Can art continue to exist without an aesth... William Conger
