Given Kant's model - seemingly thought is sense sensation turned into representations (intuited forms- objects, things, concepts) which then form a language - ie. we think in a mixture of codes - that we must in turn decipher and interpret before we can translate it into some common form and communicate it to others -
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 10:06 AM, William Conger <[email protected]>wrote: > Why not go further and admit that thought is language? Or, one could say > that > language is circumscribed by thought. > wc > > > > ________________________________ > From: saul ostrow <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Sat, January 19, 2013 8:54:13 AM > Subject: Re: wake up > > this also takes us back to the topic of thought being circumscribed by > language > > On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Michael Brady > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > On Jan 19, 2013, at 9:28 AM, saul ostrow <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Though I would suggest that depiction is a semiotic system (one of > visual > > > signs and symbols) and therefore linguistic. > > > > Thank you. Much more succinct than my reply. > > > > > > > > | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | > > Michael Brady > > > > > > > -- > S a u l O s t r o w > > *Critical Voices* > 21STREETPROJECTS > La Table Ronde > 162 West 21 Street > NYC, NY 10011 > > [email protected] > www.21stprojects.org > > -- S a u l O s t r o w *Critical Voices* 21STREETPROJECTS La Table Ronde 162 West 21 Street NYC, NY 10011 [email protected] www.21stprojects.org
