Why not go further and admit that thought is language? Or, one could say that language is circumscribed by thought. wc
________________________________ From: saul ostrow <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Sat, January 19, 2013 8:54:13 AM Subject: Re: wake up this also takes us back to the topic of thought being circumscribed by language On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Michael Brady <[email protected]>wrote: > On Jan 19, 2013, at 9:28 AM, saul ostrow <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Though I would suggest that depiction is a semiotic system (one of visual > > signs and symbols) and therefore linguistic. > > Thank you. Much more succinct than my reply. > > > > | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | > Michael Brady > > -- S a u l O s t r o w *Critical Voices* 21STREETPROJECTS La Table Ronde 162 West 21 Street NYC, NY 10011 [email protected] www.21stprojects.org
