very english Public School  and ivy thinking  - not very American public
school were literacy was the goal

*CriticalPractice*
21 TREET PROJECTS
 La   Table   Ronde
162 West 21 Street
NYC,    NY   10011

[email protected]
www.21stprojects.org


On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Lew Schwartz <[email protected]> wrote:

> My point was not to argue that we must include "ART," but that a real
> engagement with the classical definition of education ... bringing out
> what's best in each student will naturally bring about motivation toward
> learning, work, professions and the arts.
> -Lew Schwartz
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 9:40 AM, saul ostrow <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Increasingly those pedagogues who are less instrumental in their thinking
> > and understand that creativity is the next big skill (commodity) have
> > transformed the anagram of STEM into that of STEAM the A of course stands
> > for art. The logic is that Art (not as a career choice bu) as a skill set
> > supplies a heuristic model - ie trial and error learning - a question
> > creation - without focusing on getting the correct answer as much as
> > getting unexpected results - seemingly our scientist , engineers, and
> > mathematicians are no longer competitively as creative as they once were
> > because they focus more on the solution than on how might they formulate
> > the question
> > *CriticalPractice*
> > 21 TREET PROJECTS
> >  La   Table   Ronde
> > 162 West 21 Street
> > NYC,    NY   10011
> >
> > [email protected]
> > www.21stprojects.org
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 9:02 AM, William Conger <[email protected]
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > All this talk about kids and what and how they learn and whether or not
> > it
> > > is
> > > practical is not interesting beyond the level of magazine articles.
>  Yes,
> > > kids
> > > learn differently (see Gardiner's Multiple Intelligences) and yes,
> except
> > > for
> > > the privileged children the the very rich, they need to find ways to be
> > > useful
> > > in society.  There are, obviously, many ways to do that.  On a forum
> like
> > > this,
> > > with many artists and other creatives on board, it's not going to be
> easy
> > > to
> > > argue against nurturing kids' imaginations.
> > >
> > > As a youngster who only cared about art I never gave a moment's thought
> > to
> > > how I
> > > would survive as an artist or at all when I grew up, despite the
> > > consternation,
> > > worry and hand-wringing of Depression-era parents.  And I always had a
> > > part-time
> > > job from the age of thirteen until college and after college I never
> was
> > > one day
> > > without a job until age seventy.  Even now I work every day and earn
> > money
> > > with
> > > my art.  Without inheritance I was able to raise a family and live
> pretty
> > > well
> > > and give my kids debt free educations at top schools.  Maybe I was just
> > > lucky
> > > yet I do believe people should pay their own ways and, if they need to,
> > > earn
> > > whatever is required to do what they want.
> > >
> > > So, it's a blend of following one's own drummer while also being useful
> > to
> > > society that make the most sense in a democratic capitalistic society.
> > >  Education curricula and societal ideals should provide for both.
>  What's
> > > more
> > > annoying than a society that degrades imagination and creativity for
> the
> > > sake of
> > > emphasizing routine job skills? And what's more demoralizing than
> people
> > > who
> > > think their uniqueness and so-called free-spirit creativity entitles
> them
> > > to be
> > > fully supported on a public dole?
> > > wc
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: joseph berg <[email protected]>
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Sent: Sat, February 9, 2013 3:41:08 AM
> > > Subject: Re: Skills children learn from the arts
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 11:37 PM, joseph berg <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > >  On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Lew Schwartz <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Even more annoying about tripe like this is the presumption that
> > > everyone
> > > >> agrees on the same achieve/success/money definition of education.
> It's
> > > >> enraging. What happened to personal fulfillment, insight or joy?
> > > >>
> > > > They've become unaffordable luxuries for more and more people in the
> > > > 21st-c.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > - Some people see things that are and ask, Why?  Some people dream of
> > thing
> > > that never were and ask, Why not?  Some people have to go to work and
> > don't
> > > have time for all that.
> > >
> > > George Carlin

Reply via email to