Actually, what seems to have done this was the destruction of the middle
classes  who once thought education was not only a way to get ahead but to
improve one's self - sometime in the 70s when the middle classes because
they  were the only one with economic reserves became economically
vulnerable  as such  improving oneself came to  mean  preserving oneself
economically  - the irony is that  today, education does not guarantee one
will do better than their parents

*CriticalPractice*
21 TREET PROJECTS
 La   Table   Ronde
162 West 21 Street
NYC,    NY   10011

[email protected]
www.21stprojects.org


On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Lew Schwartz <[email protected]> wrote:

> I accept that, however dumbing down the goal so as to create the fiction of
> success has merely disqualified us from the game and in freefall towards
> ever lower levels of achievement.
>
> -Lew Schwartz
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 10:54 AM, saul ostrow <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > very english Public School  and ivy thinking  - not very American public
> > school were literacy was the goal
> >
> > *CriticalPractice*
> > 21 TREET PROJECTS
> >  La   Table   Ronde
> > 162 West 21 Street
> > NYC,    NY   10011
> >
> > [email protected]
> > www.21stprojects.org
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Lew Schwartz <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > My point was not to argue that we must include "ART," but that a real
> > > engagement with the classical definition of education ... bringing out
> > > what's best in each student will naturally bring about motivation
> toward
> > > learning, work, professions and the arts.
> > > -Lew Schwartz
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 9:40 AM, saul ostrow <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Increasingly those pedagogues who are less instrumental in their
> > thinking
> > > > and understand that creativity is the next big skill (commodity) have
> > > > transformed the anagram of STEM into that of STEAM the A of course
> > stands
> > > > for art. The logic is that Art (not as a career choice bu) as a skill
> > set
> > > > supplies a heuristic model - ie trial and error learning - a question
> > > > creation - without focusing on getting the correct answer as much as
> > > > getting unexpected results - seemingly our scientist , engineers, and
> > > > mathematicians are no longer competitively as creative as they once
> > were
> > > > because they focus more on the solution than on how might they
> > formulate
> > > > the question
> > > > *CriticalPractice*
> > > > 21 TREET PROJECTS
> > > >  La   Table   Ronde
> > > > 162 West 21 Street
> > > > NYC,    NY   10011
> > > >
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > www.21stprojects.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 9:02 AM, William Conger <
> [email protected]
> > > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > All this talk about kids and what and how they learn and whether or
> > not
> > > > it
> > > > > is
> > > > > practical is not interesting beyond the level of magazine articles.
> > >  Yes,
> > > > > kids
> > > > > learn differently (see Gardiner's Multiple Intelligences) and yes,
> > > except
> > > > > for
> > > > > the privileged children the the very rich, they need to find ways
> to
> > be
> > > > > useful
> > > > > in society.  There are, obviously, many ways to do that.  On a
> forum
> > > like
> > > > > this,
> > > > > with many artists and other creatives on board, it's not going to
> be
> > > easy
> > > > > to
> > > > > argue against nurturing kids' imaginations.
> > > > >
> > > > > As a youngster who only cared about art I never gave a moment's
> > thought
> > > > to
> > > > > how I
> > > > > would survive as an artist or at all when I grew up, despite the
> > > > > consternation,
> > > > > worry and hand-wringing of Depression-era parents.  And I always
> had
> > a
> > > > > part-time
> > > > > job from the age of thirteen until college and after college I
> never
> > > was
> > > > > one day
> > > > > without a job until age seventy.  Even now I work every day and
> earn
> > > > money
> > > > > with
> > > > > my art.  Without inheritance I was able to raise a family and live
> > > pretty
> > > > > well
> > > > > and give my kids debt free educations at top schools.  Maybe I was
> > just
> > > > > lucky
> > > > > yet I do believe people should pay their own ways and, if they need
> > to,
> > > > > earn
> > > > > whatever is required to do what they want.
> > > > >
> > > > > So, it's a blend of following one's own drummer while also being
> > useful
> > > > to
> > > > > society that make the most sense in a democratic capitalistic
> > society.
> > > > >  Education curricula and societal ideals should provide for both.
> > >  What's
> > > > > more
> > > > > annoying than a society that degrades imagination and creativity
> for
> > > the
> > > > > sake of
> > > > > emphasizing routine job skills? And what's more demoralizing than
> > > people
> > > > > who
> > > > > think their uniqueness and so-called free-spirit creativity
> entitles
> > > them
> > > > > to be
> > > > > fully supported on a public dole?
> > > > > wc
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > From: joseph berg <[email protected]>
> > > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > > Sent: Sat, February 9, 2013 3:41:08 AM
> > > > > Subject: Re: Skills children learn from the arts
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 11:37 PM, joseph berg <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >  On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Lew Schwartz <[email protected]
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Even more annoying about tripe like this is the presumption that
> > > > > everyone
> > > > > >> agrees on the same achieve/success/money definition of
> education.
> > > It's
> > > > > >> enraging. What happened to personal fulfillment, insight or joy?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > > They've become unaffordable luxuries for more and more people in
> > the
> > > > > > 21st-c.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > - Some people see things that are and ask, Why?  Some people dream
> of
> > > > thing
> > > > > that never were and ask, Why not?  Some people have to go to work
> and
> > > > don't
> > > > > have time for all that.
> > > > >
> > > > > George Carlin

Reply via email to