A contribution. Thanks.
wc

________________________________
 From:
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] 
Sent:
Saturday, December 28, 2013 8:38 PM
Subject: Re: Aesthetic Ecstasy
 

  Saul
said that judgment followed the aesthetic ecstasy  earlier in a
different
phrasing. I also think affect is a better word than
experience  and certainly
than ecstasy, which has other connotations
and is a surprising choice on
Cheerskep's part.The aesthetic affect
can vary from a what was that to a much
longer and more complex event
and I would suppose that both extremes would
have their own kinds of
reflection.

-----Original Message-----
From:
Cheerskep <[email protected]>
To: aesthetics-l <[email protected]>
Sent: Sat, Dec 28, 2013 6:25 pm
Subject: Re: Aesthetic Ecstasy

In a message
dated 12/28/13 4:08:06 PM, [email protected] writes:


> might aesthetic
reflection work better - and allow the ecstasy be
> understood as affect
>
>
For some it certainly may. For me it doesn't, because I see three
different
stages in the kind of aesthetic event I'm addressing. First, the
raw-data
encounter with the work -- seeing it, hearing it, reading it. Second,
the
almost immediate reaction -- the feeling I'm now calling aesthetic
ecstasy.
Third, any subsequent attempt to articulate what just happened, and how
I
felt,
and (to the extent possible) why.   I persist in feeling third stage
amounts to my "reflections". They can go on for a long time after the
ecstasy
itself is over. If you go to GOOGLE and enter the two words
"Reflections on"
you
see a large number of essays with titles that begin that way, and, for
me,
that period of reflection is, for me, unmistakably different from the
ecstasy.
(Burke's REFLECTIONS ON THE FRENCH REVOLUTION runs to 98,000
words. In
literature-appreciation, there have been "Reflections on" given short
stories
that are longer than the story itself, and they are cerebral events,
not the
"feeling" itself.)

But exactly what I've been claiming is that individual
"words" do not
"have" "meanings". That second stage -- the "ecstasy" -- is
emotional,
a
"feeling", and I personally think of "reflections" as something
collected in
tranquility. If I burn my hand by encountering flame at the
stove, I
wouldn't think
of the pain as a reflection on the flame. But that's
my own personal
word-use. If a different use works for someone else, there's
no way I
can call
them "wrong". At most I might claim their use will occasion
an unwanted
notion
in many readers (I often did that as an editor), but I
could be wrong
about
that.

Reply via email to