You do realize that people in lawsuits can't generally talk about them while in 
progress? Don't you? 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 




----- Original Message -----

From: "Sean Heskett" <af...@zirkel.us> 
To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" <af@af.afmug.com> 
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2018 4:36:36 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF subscription notification 




Being as Ubiquiti has decided to go down the frivolous lawsuit path as their 
business model i've decided to never use any Ubiquiti products or services in 
my business model. 


The only way for me to change my business model to include Ubiquiti would be 
for them to change their business model. 


Suing your customers and inflicting our industry with harm puts you outside of 
my vendor list. 


Also saying "but if you want to talk about products or anything other than the 
lawsuit, feel free to reach out to me privately." is kind of like Ford in the 
1970's saying "if you want to talk about anything else besides exploding 
Pintos, feel free to reach out to me privately." The lawsuit is both a symptom 
and a cause to problems at Ubiquiti and you can't just brush the elephant in 
the room under the rug. 


2 cents 


-Sean 








On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 9:28 AM Cameron Crum < cc...@murcevilo.com > wrote: 



In the interest of full disclosure, for those that don't know, and given the 
current environment, when I joined the group I had my own company (still do, 
just not doing much with it currently), but now also work for ubnt although I 
am not here to shill for them nor will I involve myself in discussions about 
them unless I see something grossly in error. I would actually rather keep that 
side of things separate from this group as I value the relationships here above 
any employment scenario. My job at ubnt is actually to engage with operators 
and try to find a better way to create and maintain relationships with them. I 
hope to take all the past failures and criticisms and present them with a plan 
on how to be better at that side of things. I actually prefer to hear the bad 
stuff as that is what I can use to help change things, hopefully. I don't want 
this to turn into a discussion about the company, but if you want to talk about 
products or anything other than the lawsuit, feel free to reach out to me 
privately. I just don't want to seem like the enemy lurker. 


Best, 


Cameron 


On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 10:11 AM, Bill Prince < part15...@gmail.com > wrote: 

<blockquote>


Likewise. I hope that he is lurking in incognito mode at least. 

bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> 


On 9/15/2018 8:44 AM, Jason McKemie wrote: 

<blockquote>
Yes, he is missed. 

On Saturday, September 15, 2018, < ch...@wbmfg.com > wrote: 

<blockquote>




Harass, welcome. 
I hope for the day to see Ken Hohof show up. 




From: Mathew Howard 
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2018 5:58 PM 
To: AFMUG 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF subscription notification 


Well, it would only be new lurkers that would get outed, I assume... but yeah, 
if all we're seeing is an email address, that can be pretty anonymous anyway. 

I'm not sure what good it would really do us though... other than give us an 
opportunity to harass new people. 


On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 4:11 PM < ch...@wbmfg.com > wrote: 

<blockquote>




Probably best to not out the lurkers. There are about 500 list members but only 
about 10% post. 




From: Mathew Howard 
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2018 3:03 PM 
To: AFMUG 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF subscription notification 



I assume most of the subscribers to this list never actually post anything. It 
might be kind of interesting to see who's watching us... 

I imagine there are some people that wouldn't like it, but if they aren't going 
to every post anything anyway, do we care? 



On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 3:52 PM David Coudron < david.coud...@advantenon.com > 
wrote: 

<blockquote>



I think enough information is shared feely in this group to warrant folks being 
identified as recipients of the information. If I were signing up, I don’t 
think it would be unreasonable to be identified as being a part of the list 
given the value of the discussions on the list. 

Regards, 

David Coudron 


From: AF < af-boun...@af.afmug.com > On Behalf Of Adam Moffett 
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2018 3:34 PM 
To: af@af.afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF subscription notification 

A manufacturer rep might prefer to quietly lurk and observe....or a government 
rep. 

Nobody is entitled to privacy in a public forum, but I'm sure some would prefer 
it. 

-Adam 



On 9/14/2018 1:53 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote: 
<blockquote>

xx...@xxxx.xxx has been successfully subscribed to AF. 

I am thinking of posting this when new people join. 

Or do new list subscribers deserve to remain incognito until they out 
themselves? 





-- 
AF mailing list 
AF@af.afmug.com 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 

</blockquote>


-- 
AF mailing list 
AF@af.afmug.com 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
-- 
AF mailing list 
AF@af.afmug.com 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 

</blockquote>


-- 
AF mailing list 
AF@af.afmug.com 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 

</blockquote>



</blockquote>


-- 
AF mailing list 
AF@af.afmug.com 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 


</blockquote>

-- 
AF mailing list 
AF@af.afmug.com 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 

</blockquote>

-- 
AF mailing list 
AF@af.afmug.com 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 

-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to