Water entering the units, primarily through the Ethernet ports.
$5 worth of gasket material would have engineered it correctly.
On 17 Sep 2018, at 19:43, Mike Hammett wrote:
What kind of failures?
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix><https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange><https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"Mike Meluskey" <m...@broadband.vi
<mailto:m...@broadband.vi>>
*To: *"AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" <af@af.afmug.com
<mailto:af@af.afmug.com>>
*Sent: *Monday, September 17, 2018 6:34:13 PM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] AF subscription notification
I was one of Ubiquiti’s first customers, their SR wireless cards
that
plugged into MT RB532.
The lawsuit combined with the AF24’s 95% failure rate in the
Hurricanes (compared to the 0% failure of Ceragon IP-20 and 5%
Cambium
450m) have put Ubiquiti on our former vendor list.
On 17 Sep 2018, at 18:14, Robert Andrews wrote:
> +100
>
> On 09/17/2018 02:36 PM, Sean Heskett wrote:
>> Being as Ubiquiti has decided to go down the frivolous lawsuit
path
>> as their business model i've decided to never use any Ubiquiti
>> products or services in my business model.
>>
>> The only way for me to change my business model to include
Ubiquiti
>> would be for them to change their business model.
>>
>> Suing your customers and inflicting our industry with harm
puts you
>> outside of my vendor list.
>>
>> Also saying "but if you want to talk about products or
anything other
>> than the lawsuit, feel free to reach out to me privately." is
kind of
>> like Ford in the 1970's saying "if you want to talk about
anything
>> else besides exploding Pintos, feel free to reach out to me
>> privately." The lawsuit is both a symptom and a cause to
problems at
>> Ubiquiti and you can't just brush the elephant in the room
under the
>> rug.
>>
>> 2 cents
>>
>> -Sean
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 9:28 AM Cameron Crum
<cc...@murcevilo.com <mailto:cc...@murcevilo.com>
>> <mailto:cc...@murcevilo.com>> wrote:
>>
>> In the interest of full disclosure, for those that don't
know,
>> and
>> given the current environment, when I joined the group I
had my
>> own
>> company (still do, just not doing much with it currently),
but
>> now
>> also work for ubnt although I am not here to shill for
them nor
>> will
>> I involve myself in discussions about them unless I see
something
>> grossly in error. I would actually rather keep that side of
>> things
>> separate from this group as I value the relationships here
above
>> any
>> employment scenario. My job at ubnt is actually to engage with
>> operators and try to find a better way to create and maintain
>> relationships with them. I hope to take all the past
failures and
>> criticisms and present them with a plan on how to be
better at
>> that
>> side of things. I actually prefer to hear the bad stuff as
that
>> is
>> what I can use to help change things, hopefully. I don't want
>> this
>> to turn into a discussion about the company, but if you
want to
>> talk
>> about products or anything other than the lawsuit, feel
free to
>> reach out to me privately. I just don't want to seem like the
>> enemy
>> lurker.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Cameron
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 10:11 AM, Bill Prince
>> <part15...@gmail.com <mailto:part15...@gmail.com>
>> <mailto:part15...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Likewise. I hope that he is lurking in incognito mode at
>> least.
>>
>>
>> bp
>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>
>> On 9/15/2018 8:44 AM, Jason McKemie wrote:
>>> Yes, he is missed.
>>>
>>> On Saturday, September 15, 2018, <ch...@wbmfg.com
<mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>
>>> <mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Harass, welcome.
>>> I hope for the day to see Ken Hohof show up.
>>> *From:* Mathew Howard
>>> *Sent:* Friday, September 14, 2018 5:58 PM
>>> *To:* AFMUG
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] AF subscription notification
>>> Well, it would only be new lurkers that would get
outed,
>>> I
>>> assume... but yeah, if all we're seeing is an email
>>> address, that can be pretty anonymous anyway.
>>> I'm not sure what good it would really do us
though...
>>> other than give us an opportunity to harass new people.
>>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 4:11 PM <ch...@wbmfg.com
<mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Probably best to not out the lurkers. There are
>>> about
>>> 500 list members but only about 10% post.
>>> *From:* Mathew Howard
>>> *Sent:* Friday, September 14, 2018 3:03 PM
>>> *To:* AFMUG
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] AF subscription
notification
>>> I assume most of the subscribers to this list
never
>>> actually post anything. It might be kind of
>>> interesting to see who's watching us...
>>> I imagine there are some people that wouldn't
like
>>> it,
>>> but if they aren't going to every post anything
>>> anyway, do we care?
>>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 3:52 PM David Coudron
>>> <david.coud...@advantenon.com
<mailto:david.coud...@advantenon.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I think enough information is shared
feely in
>>> this
>>> group to warrant folks being identified as
>>> recipients of the information. If I were
signing
>>> up, I don’t think it would be
unreasonable to
>>> be
>>> identified as being a part of the list
given the
>>> value of the discussions on the list.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> David Coudron
>>>
>>> *From:*AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com
<mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com>> *On Behalf
>>> Of
>>> *Adam Moffett
>>> *Sent:* Friday, September 14, 2018 3:34 PM
>>> *To:* af@af.afmug.com
<mailto:af@af.afmug.com>
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] AF subscription
>>> notification
>>>
>>> A manufacturer rep might prefer to
quietly lurk
>>> and observe....or a government rep.
>>>
>>> Nobody is entitled to//privacy in a public
>>> forum,
>>> but I'm sure some would prefer it.
>>>
>>> -Adam
>>>
>>> On 9/14/2018 1:53 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com
<mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> xx...@xxxx.xxx <mailto:xx...@xxxx.xxx> has been successfully
>>> subscribed to AF.
>>>
>>> I am thinking of posting this when new
>>> people
>>> join.
>>>
>>> Or do new list subscribers deserve to
remain
>>> incognito until they out themselves?
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
