You might attempt to use the new small fcc ruling to convince them that they are preempted.
Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 26, 2019, at 5:18 PM, Chris Fabien <ch...@lakenetmi.com> wrote: > > There's lots of variations on this locality dependent. > > For example in MI I need a state-mandated municipal permit to have telecom > infrastructure in the ROW even for an aerial run on someone else's poles. > > Our county had to be satisfied we were a "real public utility" before they > would issue underground permits. This was their own policy they made up as > far as I could tell. Even though the municipal permit specifically allows > "any entity". > > None of this was at all related to a 477 filing. > >> On Sat, Jan 26, 2019, 3:49 AM TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com wrote: >> So reading through the list the consensus is anyone filing a 477 can access >> the row, does this require a city or county permit with plans etc? For >> laying duct, installing a pole or cabinet etc? >> >> What is the process to attach to poles? Just make a request with the pole >> owner? City permits? How do you identify the pole owner? >> >> So if I'm a wisp today and want to be a fisp (haha) tomorrow I just need to >> consider myself a ISP, pull permits with the city or county and start >> digging? Are permits even required to work in the row in most cases? >> >> For poles I'm assuming you make drawings of the route, get an attachment >> agreement with the owner and once make ready is done your good to dangle >> your string? >> >> If it's any consolation I searched the archives for a few hours before >> asking these stupid questions 🤔 >> >> TJ >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
