Ken - exactly, I forgot about OFDM..

Sent from my iPad

> On Feb 26, 2019, at 6:23 PM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:
> 
> If you’re referring to AF11, isn’t that an OFDM platform?  Which is an 
> unusual choice for a licensed radio, most are single carrier QAM.  OFDM lets 
> you implement with a DSP approach and naturally gives you a power spectral 
> density plot that looks like “Bart’s head”.  It naturally yields a certain 
> amount of out-of-band filtering, probably saving money.  But then to meet a 
> rigorous OOB emissions template, now you need additional analog filtering 
> which eats into the cost savings.  Especially at 11 GHz where I assume you 
> aren’t just throwing in a few inductors and capacitors to create a brick wall 
> filter.
>  
>  
> From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> On Behalf Of Tim Hardy
> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2019 4:23 PM
> To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com>
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Higher power 18Ghz radios..
>  
> Sloppy filters.
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
> On Feb 26, 2019, at 5:18 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Well, I'm just guessing, but what other reason would there be for occupying 
> 79mhz with a 56mhz radio?
>  
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 4:08 PM Tim Hardy <thardy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If that’s the case, it must’ve been truly horrid at 56 MHz.  There are 
> consequences in this wasting of spectrum - you’ll notice that modulations 
> less than 16 QAM are not currently coordinated or licensed since they fail to 
> meet the FCC’s minimum of 1 bit/Hz.  Any operation of the AF-11 at QPSK or 
> 1/4 QPSK is not actually legal..
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
> On Feb 26, 2019, at 4:34 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Yeah, but my point is that they made a really noisy 56mhz radio work by just 
> occupying a full 80mhz channel... at least that's the way I understand it. It 
> seems like they're kind of doing the same thing here.
>  
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 3:24 PM Tim Hardy <thardy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> While the AF-11 used a 56 MHz chipset, the radio occupies 79.6 MHz - unlike 
> all other radios with these chips that limit their bw to 56 MHz (this used to 
> be the ETSI maximum).  The AF-11 system gain is horrible for 1024 QAM when 
> compared to other outdoor radios - either full 60 MHz or full 80 MHz bw.
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
> On Feb 26, 2019, at 3:26 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Interesting, so I'm guessing that they're able to reduce the noise to an 
> acceptable level at that high of power by using a narrower channel... kind of 
> like what Ubiquiti did with the AirFiber 11.
>  
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 1:54 PM Tim Hardy <thardy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>  
> Just an FYI..
> According to this chart, the occupied bandwidth is only 64.5 MHz so you will 
> be losing capacity vs radios that occupy the full 80 MHz bandwidth.  The DW 
> radio will have to be coordinated and licensed in one of the 80 MHz channel 
> allocations as there are no FCC channel plans between 51 MHz and 79 MHz.  
> There are only 4-channel pairs available at 80 MHz and its difficult to 
> coordinate multiple pairs in many areas as a result.  Finally, while these 
> power levels are impressive, they don't tell the full story and you really 
> need to compare the system gain values at the desired modulations.  The DW 
> 64.5 MHz radio’s system gain at 2048 QAM is 83 dB vs. the WTM 4100 80 MHz  
> radio’s system gain at 2048 QAM which will be 73.5 dB.
> 
> 
> On Feb 26, 2019, at 12:19 PM, Peter Kranz <pkr...@unwiredltd.com> wrote:
>  
> +31 is the advertised 2048QAM output on the HP variant. Dragonwave contacted 
> me offline and is indicating a March availability. Here is the table of power 
> output levels for that radio. It should also support 4096QAM, but I’m not 
> sure if that’s available in the software yet.
>  
> <image001.png>
>  
> Peter Kranz
> www.UnwiredLtd.com
> Desk: 510-868-1614 x100
> Mobile: 510-207-0000
> pkr...@unwiredltd.com
>  
> From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> On Behalf Of Ken Hohhof
> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2019 8:27 PM
> To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' <af@af.afmug.com>
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Higher power 18Ghz radios..
>  
> Looks like PTP820c is only +16.
>  
> You’re talking about xmt power actually at 2048QAM modulation, right?  +31 is 
> hard to believe.
>  
> I remember hearing that Broadcom was supposed to have a chip with adaptive 
> digital predistortion for high xmt power also 4096QAM not sure if that became 
> real.
>  
> From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> On Behalf Of Peter Kranz
> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2019 6:51 PM
> To: af@af.afmug.com
> Subject: [AFMUG] Higher power 18Ghz radios..
>  
> Dragonwave announced over a year ago the Harmony Enhanced 18HP, with +31 TX 
> power at 2048 QAM, but have never made it to production as far as I know. 
> From the top of my head, here are some of the major radios TX power in 18 Ghz 
> band:
>  
> Dragonwave Harmony Enahcend HP – 31 <Vaporware?>
> Dragonwave Harmony Enhanced SP – 22
> Bridgewave Navigator – 19
> Aviat WTM 4200 – 17.5
> SIAE AlfoPlus2 – 17
>  
> Curious if anyone is aware of an 18Ghz dual core radio capable of higher TX 
> power at 2048QAM? It’s quite difficult to license 6Ghz or 11Ghz paths in my 
> market.
>  
> Peter Kranz
> www.UnwiredLtd.com
> Desk: 510-868-1614 x100
> Mobile: 510-207-0000
> pkr...@unwiredltd.com
>  
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>  
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to