sometimes, like people, old structures just need to be put down. It was
just time
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 11:42 AM Robert Andrews <i...@avantwireless.com>
wrote:
> The repairs were to prevent the spire from collapsing..
>
> On 04/17/2019 09:12 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
> > It was undergoing restoration/repair work at the time (which may be
> > implicated as the source of the fire). Perhaps they were doing some fire
> > prevention work too?
> >
> > bp
> > <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
> >
> > On 4/17/2019 8:59 AM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
> >> Smart ass....
> >> Perhaps some bureaucracy would not allow the modification. I have a
> >> kid that lives in England. They have structures that cannot be
> >> repaired, even in the most minor way, without detailed plans,
> >> approvals and using only a select set of approved handymen.
> >> *From:* Bill Prince
> >> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 17, 2019 9:55 AM
> >> *To:* af@af.afmug.com
> >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Notre Dame
> >>
> >> Maybe because it was built 800 years ago?
> >>
> >> bp
> >> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
> >>
> >> On 4/17/2019 8:50 AM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
> >>> According to the series of tubes I consulted:
> >>> *“Notre*-*Dame did*not*have*automatic*sprinklers*in the framework of
> >>> the roof, and its attic space*was*not compartmentalized with
> >>> fire-breaking walls, said Frédéric Létoffé, a construction expert.“
> >>> Too bad and I wonder why.
> >>>
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> --
> >> AF mailing list
> >> AF@af.afmug.com
> >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
