Some vendors (esp with LTE) allow you to type in a frequency rather than
pick from a list. It was up to the operator to stay compliant. In an
unlicensed (or lightly licensed) band the temptation will always be
there to avoid interference by moving to one of those nice quiet
channels that nobody else appears to be using. One little cheat and the
customers are suddenly happy.
Manufacturers should just take the option away....at least in Band 42.
Someone will always use it if it's there.
On 1/23/2020 8:20 PM, Tim Hardy wrote:
According to the Notice of Violation, they were found to be operating
on 3723 - 3732 MHz which is a clear violation of 1.903 and you’re
right that this is how they got caught. No question that had they not
interfered with the ground station, this wouldn’t have come up. Once
the FCC finds one thing, they’re going to look at everything else and
that’s how the unregistered locations ended up part of this.
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 7:25 PM Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com
<mailto:af...@kwisp.com>> wrote:
There seem to be 2 issues, one is unregistered locations which
seems kind of petty, the other is transmitting above 3.7 GHz. I’m
going to assume the second one got them in trouble and led to
finding the first one?
*From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com
<mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com>> *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones
*Sent:* Thursday, January 23, 2020 5:43 PM
*To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com
<mailto:af@af.afmug.com>>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement actions - unauthorized
operation in 3650 - 3700 MHz band
The 320 you could go to at least 3695 on 10mhz. Plus the oob so if
it was low 3700. But jerkoffs like that that don't even make a
cursory check for earth stations you never know what they've done.
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020, 5:03 PM <ch...@wbmfg.com
<mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>> wrote:
Jamming C band CATV...
*From:*Mathew Howard
*Sent:*Thursday, January 23, 2020 3:59 PM
*To:*AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
*Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement actions - unauthorized
operation in 3650 - 3700 MHz band
It's interesting that the signal they were interfering with
was in the 3700-4200mhz band. I wonder what they were doing...
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 4:24 PM Steve Jones
<thatoneguyst...@gmail.com <mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>>
wrote:
Isnt that the first 3ghz one?
I wish that more people had been nailed, its said other
"license" holders had no recourse, it took a fixed station
to be interfered with
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 3:35 PM Tim Hardy
<thardy...@gmail.com <mailto:thardy...@gmail.com>> wrote:
BREVARD WIRELESS, INC. DBA FLORIDA HIGH SPEED
INTERNET, LICENSEE OF STATION WQMJ660. Brevard
Wireless, Inc. dba Florida High Speed Internet agrees
to $16,000 settlement and compliance plan resolving
investigation into unauthorized operation in the
3650-3700 <tel:3650-3700>MHz band . Action by: Deputy
Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 2020-01-22 by
Order/Consent Decree. (DA No. 20-46). EB.
DA-20-46A1.docx
<https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-20-46A1.docx>DA-20-46A1.pdf
<https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-20-46A1.pdf>DA-20-46A1.txt
<https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-20-46A1.txt>
Sent from my iPad
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
