I have less sympathy for them if they went out of their way to get an international AP because the US model wouldn't let them cheat.  It's harder to believe it was just ignorance at that point.

I knew a guy who used to set all his Ubqiuiti's to "Hong Kong" so he could use DFS bands without DFS and ignore the EIRP limit.  I'm like bruh you can't even pretend that was an accident.



On 1/24/2020 2:40 PM, Mathew Howard wrote:
Yeah, you're right... I think what I was thinking of is that the spectrum analyser can scan that range. I wouldn't be surprised if they were using some ROW radios, it looks like the PMP450 does come in a 3.55-3.8ghz variety.

On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 10:21 AM Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com <mailto:dmmoff...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    US models of the 450 definitely won't let you do that.


    On 1/24/2020 10:18 AM, Mathew Howard wrote:
    I checked some of their registrations, and it looks like they're
    mostly PMP450 and a few Ubiquiti radios. It's been awhile since
    I've done anything with Canopy 3.65ghz stuff, but it seems to me
    like you might be able to set them that high... or maybe they
    have some non-US radios...

    On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 7:01 AM Dennis Burgess via AF
    <af@af.afmug.com <mailto:af@af.afmug.com>> wrote:

        Wonder what gear they were using. ☹  That allowed them to
        transmit that high?

        *LTI-Full_175px*

        *Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
        MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE, MTCSE, HE IPv6 Sage,
        Cambium ePMP Certified *

        Author of "Learn RouterOS- Second Edition”

        *Link Technologies, Inc*-- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services

        *Office*: 314-735-0270  Website: http://www.linktechs.net
        <http://www.linktechs.net/>

        Create Wireless Coverage’s with www.towercoverage.com
        <http://www.towercoverage.com>

        *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com
        <mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com>> *On Behalf Of * Tim Hardy
        *Sent:* Thursday, January 23, 2020 7:21 PM
        *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com
        <mailto:af@af.afmug.com>>
        *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement actions - unauthorized
        operation in 3650 - 3700 MHz band

        According to the Notice of Violation, they were found to be
        operating on 3723 - 3732 MHz which is a clear violation of
        1.903 and you’re right that this is how they got caught.  No
        question that had they not interfered with the ground
        station, this wouldn’t have come up.  Once the FCC finds one
        thing, they’re going to look at everything else and that’s
        how the unregistered locations ended up part of this.

        On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 7:25 PM Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com
        <mailto:af...@kwisp.com>> wrote:

            There seem to be 2 issues, one is unregistered locations
            which seems kind of petty, the other is transmitting
            above 3.7 GHz.  I’m going to assume the second one got
            them in trouble and led to finding the first one?

            *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com
            <mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com>> *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones
            *Sent:* Thursday, January 23, 2020 5:43 PM
            *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com
            <mailto:af@af.afmug.com>>
            *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement actions -
            unauthorized operation in 3650 - 3700 MHz band

            The 320 you could go to at least 3695 on 10mhz. Plus the
            oob so if it was low 3700. But jerkoffs like that that
            don't even make a cursory check for earth stations you
            never know what they've done.

            On Thu, Jan 23, 2020, 5:03 PM <ch...@wbmfg.com
            <mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>> wrote:

                Jamming C band CATV...

                *From:*Mathew Howard

                *Sent:*Thursday, January 23, 2020 3:59 PM

                *To:*AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group

                *Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement actions -
                unauthorized operation in 3650 - 3700 MHz band

                It's interesting that the signal they were
                interfering with was in the 3700-4200mhz band. I
                wonder what they were doing...

                On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 4:24 PM Steve Jones
                <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com
                <mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>> wrote:

                    Isnt that the first 3ghz one?

                    I wish that more people had been nailed, its said
                    other "license" holders had no recourse, it took
                    a fixed station to be interfered with

                    On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 3:35 PM Tim Hardy
                    <thardy...@gmail.com
                    <mailto:thardy...@gmail.com>> wrote:

                        BREVARD WIRELESS, INC. DBA FLORIDA HIGH SPEED
                        INTERNET, LICENSEE OF STATION WQMJ660.
                        Brevard Wireless, Inc. dba Florida High Speed
                        Internet agrees to $16,000 settlement and
                        compliance plan resolving investigation into
                        unauthorized operation in the 3650-3700
                        <tel:3650-3700>MHz band . Action by: Deputy
                        Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted:
                        2020-01-22 by Order/Consent Decree. (DA No.
                        20-46). EB. DA-20-46A1.docx
                        
<https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-20-46A1.docx>DA-20-46A1.pdf
                        
<https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-20-46A1.pdf>DA-20-46A1.txt
                        <https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-20-46A1.txt>

                        Sent from my iPad

-- AF mailing list
                        AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
                        http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- AF mailing list
                    AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
                    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

                
------------------------------------------------------------------------

-- AF mailing list
                AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
                http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- AF mailing list
                AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
                http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- AF mailing list
            AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
            http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- AF mailing list
        AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
        http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


-- AF mailing list
    AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to