I second everything David said. We've been on it 2 years now and it's a
tool I will never give up. It's worth every penny

On Fri, Jan 31, 2020, 11:03 AM David Coudron <david.coud...@advantenon.com>
wrote:

> We have been using Preseem for about a year now.   We originally
> implemented it as a way to better manage the customer experience and
> potentially make better use of our DIA bandwidth and maybe reduce some DIA
> costs.   I am guessing someone could build a similar product on their own
> with open source.
>
> However, what we have found is that we get significantly more than the
> customer experience management with the tool.   The reporting is beyond
> awesome, it has become our number one tool for troubleshooting customers
> complaints.   Others on this list can weigh in on how they use it, but our
> typical day goes something like this:
> 1) During our morning Ops call, we take a peek at Preseem's recap of tower
> latency yesterday.  If nothing new shows up for Red towers/access points,
> we look at Yellow Access Points (this is a ranking of Aps/towers over
> certain latency thresholds)
> 2) If any customer calls have come in, we use the Preseem tool to see if
> they are experiencing latency issues.   If they are, we check our SNMP
> based monitoring tool to see if their wireless connection to the tower has
> changed or if the AP is experience issues.   We had a pretty major
> windstorm go through two weeks ago, and we found a few customers whose
> latency spiked and investigation into their connection showed there was an
> issue with their dish.
> 3) If latency has climbed, but the AP and upstream devices are all OK, we
> check into the experience of that customer to others on their tower.   Is
> their latency spike unique, does it happen only under load, etc.   More
> often than not, the issue is specific to them, doesn't only happen under
> load, and only at certain times.  It is usually from streaming a show on
> the TV in the far back upstairs bedroom (or something like that) with a
> crappy connection to their wifi router in the house.
>
> We have found it to be an indispensable tool for this kind of thing.   We
> bought it for QoE, but use it daily for monitoring/troubleshooting
> activities.   Not only do you get a hosted reporting solution, you have
> access to some pretty smart folks.
>
> Just this morning our first line of support person said "If Preseem ever
> goes down, I will cry, it is my favorite troubleshooting tool".   We were
> having a discussion about how you could compare QoE/Latency from a customer
> to other customers on the same AP, to others on the Same Tower, to others
> in the same DIA, etc.   It is hard to explain how much it changes the way
> you think about the "My Internet is slow" complaint.  Quite often this
> person will get a call about it being slow last night, and she will ask the
> time at which it happened and pull up very detailed information like "You
> were using 45 of you 50 Mbps plan with 50 ms latency".
>
> Take the time to go through the demo with Gerrit.   You may not decide it
> is not for you, but it won't be a waste of time to understand why they are
> pushing it so hard.
>
> David Coudron
> david.coud...@advantenon.com  |  Mobile: 612-991-7474
>
> Advantenon, Inc.
> i...@advantenon.com  |  3500 Vicksburg Lane N, Suite 315, Plymouth, MN
> 55447  |  www.advantenon.com  |  Phone: 800-704-4720  |  Local:
> 612-454-1545
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> On Behalf Of Adam Moffett
> Sent: Friday, January 31, 2020 10:41 AM
> To: af@af.afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] bufferbloat
>
> I think they have integration with common CRM's like Sonar.
>
> You sound exactly like I sounded 15 years ago.  The more stuff I have to
> deal with every day, the more I'm ok with outsourcing some of my troubles
> to someone else.
>
> I just paid a guy $800 to replace an exhaust inducer in my furnace.  I
> know that inducer is $99 and goes in with 4 screws and a hose clamp, but
> it's more worth my time to let someone else take care of it so I can do
> something else.  Same goes for Preseem vs the $300 Linux box.
>
> I'm not knocking your method.  There's a point in the business cycle where
> there's more time than there is cash, and it will make sense to do some
> more DIY things.  I'm just saying the Preseem thing has value too.
>
> -Adam
>
>
> On 1/31/2020 11:34 AM, Dev wrote:
> > I’m getting spammed like every day with the Preseem guys selling what
> seem like expensive hacks of fq_codel to reduce bufferbloat. Is there
> anything else interesting about their technology besides deploying open
> source implementation of fq_codel or CAKE on commodity hardware, which we
> already do to great effect on a $300 single board Linux box with a few
> ports? I guess they have a pretty dashboard, anyhing other than that?
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to