What does this have to do with CAF-II?

For us we pretty much know where the loaded APs are, it’s a matter of smoothing 
out the experience. 

> On Jan 31, 2020, at 10:18 PM, Simon Westlake <simon@sonar.software> wrote:
> 
> It's interesting to me how many people are looking at the CoDeL piece of 
> Preseem first - their original vision (and what I still think is the most 
> interesting) is the direct TCP monitoring they do to try to figure out which 
> APs have issues, which customers have issues, and what the root causes of 
> those issues are. The CoDeL piece was just a cherry on top.
> 
> The CoDeL piece isn't very hard (if you're not worried about scaling it very 
> far) but the monitoring and diagnostic tools they have are, I think, 
> fantastic. I've never heard anyone not rave about them, and I know tons of 
> people using them.
> 
>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 1:06 PM Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:
>> ISP Radio did an interview with them and it’s still on Youtube.  2 years old 
>> though.
>> 
>> https://www.preseem.com/2018/04/isp-radio-subscriber-queues-latency/
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> On Behalf Of David Coudron
>> Sent: Friday, January 31, 2020 12:41 PM
>> To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com>
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] bufferbloat
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Others probably know better.  I think some of the other tools are DPI based 
>> where Preseem is FQ-CoDel, but I am not sure that is true of Procera.   
>> Others integrate to the CRM systems, so I am not sure that is a 
>> differentiator.   Might be best to hit Preseem up directly on that question. 
>>   From our experience, they are  not high pressure or exaggerative, so you 
>> wouldn’t be opening a can of worms you can’t get the lid back on.  But maybe 
>> someone has done a more in depth investigation of the two.  Sorry, wasn’t 
>> much help on the question.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> David Coudron
>> 
>> From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> On Behalf Of Jason McKemie
>> Sent: Friday, January 31, 2020 11:48 AM
>> To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com>
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] bufferbloat
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> How does Preseem compare to Procera?
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 11:25 AM Darin Steffl <darin.ste...@mnwifi.com> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> I second everything David said. We've been on it 2 years now and it's a tool 
>> I will never give up. It's worth every penny 
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2020, 11:03 AM David Coudron <david.coud...@advantenon.com> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> We have been using Preseem for about a year now.   We originally implemented 
>> it as a way to better manage the customer experience and potentially make 
>> better use of our DIA bandwidth and maybe reduce some DIA costs.   I am 
>> guessing someone could build a similar product on their own with open 
>> source.  
>> 
>> However, what we have found is that we get significantly more than the 
>> customer experience management with the tool.   The reporting is beyond 
>> awesome, it has become our number one tool for troubleshooting customers 
>> complaints.   Others on this list can weigh in on how they use it, but our 
>> typical day goes something like this:
>> 1) During our morning Ops call, we take a peek at Preseem's recap of tower 
>> latency yesterday.  If nothing new shows up for Red towers/access points, we 
>> look at Yellow Access Points (this is a ranking of Aps/towers over certain 
>> latency thresholds)
>> 2) If any customer calls have come in, we use the Preseem tool to see if 
>> they are experiencing latency issues.   If they are, we check our SNMP based 
>> monitoring tool to see if their wireless connection to the tower has changed 
>> or if the AP is experience issues.   We had a pretty major windstorm go 
>> through two weeks ago, and we found a few customers whose latency spiked and 
>> investigation into their connection showed there was an issue with their 
>> dish.
>> 3) If latency has climbed, but the AP and upstream devices are all OK, we 
>> check into the experience of that customer to others on their tower.   Is 
>> their latency spike unique, does it happen only under load, etc.   More 
>> often than not, the issue is specific to them, doesn't only happen under 
>> load, and only at certain times.  It is usually from streaming a show on the 
>> TV in the far back upstairs bedroom (or something like that) with a crappy 
>> connection to their wifi router in the house.   
>> 
>> We have found it to be an indispensable tool for this kind of thing.   We 
>> bought it for QoE, but use it daily for monitoring/troubleshooting 
>> activities.   Not only do you get a hosted reporting solution, you have 
>> access to some pretty smart folks.   
>> 
>> Just this morning our first line of support person said "If Preseem ever 
>> goes down, I will cry, it is my favorite troubleshooting tool".   We were 
>> having a discussion about how you could compare QoE/Latency from a customer 
>> to other customers on the same AP, to others on the Same Tower, to others in 
>> the same DIA, etc.   It is hard to explain how much it changes the way you 
>> think about the "My Internet is slow" complaint.  Quite often this person 
>> will get a call about it being slow last night, and she will ask the time at 
>> which it happened and pull up very detailed information like "You were using 
>> 45 of you 50 Mbps plan with 50 ms latency".    
>> 
>> Take the time to go through the demo with Gerrit.   You may not decide it is 
>> not for you, but it won't be a waste of time to understand why they are 
>> pushing it so hard.   
>> 
>> David Coudron
>> david.coud...@advantenon.com  |  Mobile: 612-991-7474
>>  
>> Advantenon, Inc.            
>> i...@advantenon.com  |  3500 Vicksburg Lane N, Suite 315, Plymouth, MN 55447 
>>  |  www.advantenon.com  |  Phone: 800-704-4720  |  Local: 612-454-1545 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> On Behalf Of Adam Moffett
>> Sent: Friday, January 31, 2020 10:41 AM
>> To: af@af.afmug.com
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] bufferbloat
>> 
>> I think they have integration with common CRM's like Sonar.
>> 
>> You sound exactly like I sounded 15 years ago.  The more stuff I have to 
>> deal with every day, the more I'm ok with outsourcing some of my troubles to 
>> someone else.
>> 
>> I just paid a guy $800 to replace an exhaust inducer in my furnace.  I know 
>> that inducer is $99 and goes in with 4 screws and a hose clamp, but it's 
>> more worth my time to let someone else take care of it so I can do something 
>> else.  Same goes for Preseem vs the $300 Linux box.
>> 
>> I'm not knocking your method.  There's a point in the business cycle where 
>> there's more time than there is cash, and it will make sense to do some more 
>> DIY things.  I'm just saying the Preseem thing has value too.
>> 
>> -Adam
>> 
>> 
>> On 1/31/2020 11:34 AM, Dev wrote:
>> > I’m getting spammed like every day with the Preseem guys selling what seem 
>> > like expensive hacks of fq_codel to reduce bufferbloat. Is there anything 
>> > else interesting about their technology besides deploying open source 
>> > implementation of fq_codel or CAKE on commodity hardware, which we already 
>> > do to great effect on a $300 single board Linux box with a few ports? I 
>> > guess they have a pretty dashboard, anyhing other than that?
>> 
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>> -- 
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>> 
>> -- 
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>> 
>> -- 
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> 
> 
> -- 
> Simon Westlake | CEO
> PGP Key: https://flowcrypt.com/pub/simon@sonar.software
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to