Hum… we must have been typing that at the same time. I will second the ’slow’ comment on the routing engine on the MX80 platform - you will not enjoy the convergence time with that RE unless you are taking very few routes.
Mark > On Apr 14, 2020, at 2:19 PM, Josh Baird <joshba...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I wouldn't consider MX80 for new deployments. It's RE is ancient at this > point, and it's pretty slow. > > For new Juniper deployments, I would look at the MX204. If you are on a > budget, consider a MX104, but it has the same slow PPC-based RE as the MX80, > and I would try to avoid it if possible. > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 2:15 PM Gilbert Gutierrez > <mailing-li...@phxinternet.com <mailto:mailing-li...@phxinternet.com>> wrote: > I am looking to move away from Microtik on my edge. I have two CCR1072-1G-8s+ > routers and have had stability problems with random reboots over the last > year of using them. I am thinking of the Juniper MX80 platform but do not > know anything about their licensing (looking at used ones that I can get for > about $5k). I also do not know what other options are out there. > > I am needing 10G ports > Support for OSPF > Support for BGP full routes from multiple carriers > MPLS would be nice > Support VLANs > Support for various MTU sizes > > Thank you, > Gilbert > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com> > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
