How can the FCC make spectrum available for un-licensed without an act of Congress?
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 7:30 PM Erich Kaiser <er...@northcentraltower.com> wrote: > yes you are right. > > > Erich Kaiser > North Central Tower > er...@northcentraltower.com > Office: 815-570-3101 > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 6:12 PM Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: > >> More like 4.9 to 7. >> >> >> >> *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *Erich Kaiser >> *Sent:* Thursday, April 23, 2020 5:35 PM >> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com> >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] New unlicensed spectrum >> >> >> >> Two of the UNII bands are heavily used for licensed PTP and I mean >> heavily, so really if the AFC system works correctly most of the spectrum >> proposed will likely be unuseable outdoor. I feel like from a reliability >> standpoint it will be tough to count on a system that uses AFC in general. >> What about the Antenna being used on these APs are they going to be able >> to cover the entire band from 5Ghz to 6Ghz efficiently? Just thinking... >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Erich Kaiser >> >> North Central Tower >> >> er...@northcentraltower.com >> >> Office: 815-570-3101 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 5:24 PM Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us> wrote: >> >> from Fred Goldstein via the wispa list: >> >> >> >> "There are really two different types of devices approved today. A >> Standard Power device, allowed +36 dBm EIRP, must communicate daily with an >> AFC that determines what frequencies are available at its location. It must >> have geolocation. (We are waiting to see the final Order to see how the >> "client AP" is handled.) The rules for the AFC are reasonably conservative, >> so the licensed PtP users are generally pretty happy with it. And a whole >> bunch of companies have already been working on AFCs. >> >> >> The Low Power Indoor device, on the other hand, does not require AFC. It >> is limited to indoor use only (must have mains power, may not be >> weatherproof, must be labeled) and is allowed +30 dBm EIRP (clients +24 >> dBm). Since those can use any frequency, the incumbents are a wee bit >> concerned. But between building entry losses (pretty high at 6 GHz) and the >> directionality of the FS dishes, harmful interference is unlikely. That is >> likely to be a volume market for Wi-Fi 6e. The higher-end business stuff, >> and ours, will be standard power. >> >> The FNPRM asks about Very Low Power outdoor operation without AFC. Like >> cell phones and small hotspots. It also asks about higher power for >> AFC-controlled devices." >> >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 4:07 PM Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Yep...lots of buzz from this >> >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020, 3:47 PM Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us> wrote: >> >> WISPA said they are waiting for them to release the order. they are >> hoping it's 36db...there's a chance it's only 30db. >> >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 3:42 PM Tim Withrow via AF <af@af.afmug.com> >> wrote: >> >> I learned that the FCC approved 1200Mhz of unlicensed spectrum in 6 >> Gigahertz today. >> >> any idea what Eirp they approved for fixed wireless? >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
