There must be some ulterior motive here there is no way that the FCC out of
the goodness of their heart provided more unlicensed spectrum to the common
man/small business.

So the question is who can utilize this spectrum?

On Thu, Apr 23, 2020, 6:35 PM Tim Hardy <thardy...@gmail.com> wrote:

> FCC has total authority over these bands.
>
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 9:29 PM Kurt Fankhauser <lists.wavel...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> How can the FCC make spectrum available for un-licensed without an act of
>> Congress?
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 7:30 PM Erich Kaiser <er...@northcentraltower.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> yes you are right.
>>>
>>>
>>> Erich Kaiser
>>> North Central Tower
>>> er...@northcentraltower.com
>>> Office: 815-570-3101
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 6:12 PM Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> More like 4.9 to 7.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *Erich Kaiser
>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, April 23, 2020 5:35 PM
>>>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com>
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] New unlicensed spectrum
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Two of the UNII  bands are heavily used for licensed PTP and I mean
>>>> heavily, so really if the AFC system works correctly most of the spectrum
>>>> proposed will likely be unuseable outdoor.  I feel like from a reliability
>>>> standpoint it will be tough to count on a system that uses AFC in general.
>>>>  What about the Antenna being used on these APs are they going to be able
>>>> to cover the entire band from 5Ghz to 6Ghz efficiently?  Just thinking...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Erich Kaiser
>>>>
>>>> North Central Tower
>>>>
>>>> er...@northcentraltower.com
>>>>
>>>> Office: 815-570-3101
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 5:24 PM Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> from Fred Goldstein via the wispa list:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "There are really two different types of devices approved today. A
>>>> Standard Power device, allowed +36 dBm EIRP, must communicate daily with an
>>>> AFC that determines what frequencies are available at its location. It must
>>>> have geolocation. (We are waiting to see the final Order to see how the
>>>> "client AP" is handled.) The rules for the AFC are reasonably conservative,
>>>> so the licensed PtP users are generally pretty happy with it. And a whole
>>>> bunch of companies have already been working on AFCs.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The Low Power Indoor device, on the other hand, does not require AFC.
>>>> It is limited to indoor use only (must have mains power, may not be
>>>> weatherproof, must be labeled) and is allowed +30 dBm EIRP (clients +24
>>>> dBm). Since those can use any frequency, the incumbents are a wee bit
>>>> concerned. But between building entry losses (pretty high at 6 GHz) and the
>>>> directionality of the FS dishes, harmful interference is unlikely. That is
>>>> likely to be a volume market for Wi-Fi 6e. The higher-end business stuff,
>>>> and ours, will be standard power.
>>>>
>>>> The FNPRM asks about Very Low Power outdoor operation without AFC. Like
>>>> cell phones and small hotspots. It also asks about higher power for
>>>> AFC-controlled devices."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 4:07 PM Jaime Solorza <
>>>> losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Yep...lots of buzz from this
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020, 3:47 PM Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> WISPA said they are waiting for them to release the order.  they are
>>>> hoping it's 36db...there's a chance it's only 30db.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 3:42 PM Tim Withrow via AF <af@af.afmug.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I learned that the FCC approved 1200Mhz of unlicensed spectrum in 6
>>>> Gigahertz today.
>>>>
>>>> any idea what Eirp they approved for fixed wireless?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> AF mailing list
>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> AF mailing list
>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> AF mailing list
>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> AF mailing list
>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> AF mailing list
>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to