Because 100% of deaths in Utah are tested for Coronavirus...

From: Robert 
Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2020 10:07 AM
To: af@af.afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Dang, not normal

There was just an interesting article written that lamented how inaccurate 
coroners have been on cause of death for the whole existence of coroners...   
Like 50% accurate.   Why would they get better now?


On 4/26/20 8:23 AM, Bill Prince wrote:

  There is so much we don't know for a number of frustrating reasons. One is 
the asymptomatic infection problem, and how long that lasts. The other is that 
the symptoms are "similar" to the flu, and sometimes other things. One headline 
that caught my attention this morning is that Santa Clara County had 29 people 
listed as "dying of flu-like symptoms", and 9 (roughly 1/3) have been 
reclassified as COVID-19 after they tested for the virus.

  I snipped this from the article, and it pretty well sums up the situation at 
present:

    “We’ll never, ever know how many people contracted the coronavirus in San 
Clara County or California or the U.S. That ship has sailed. Even 
self-reporting would be inherently inaccurate or impossible,” Santa Clara 
County Supervisor Dave Cortese said. “Our only hope of getting a decent history 
of it is by counting the dead. I’m really disappointed that coroners all over 
the country haven’t done a better job. They’ve been signing death certificates 
as strokes or heart attacks or natural causes.”




bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

On 4/26/2020 8:12 AM, Robert wrote:

    Does it bug anyone else that this "doctor" says that we aren't treating 
this like other epidemics and quarantining the sick, when Covid-19 IS NOT LIKE 
OTHER epidemics.   It has a 2-10 day period of being contagious _without_ 
symptoms. 
         I was agreeing with him up until that point.  
        Then he goes into the NY numbers and he does the same extrapolation of 
the testing vs sick numbers that many have done before ( including myself ) 
which is BAD Science.   It's not a good test case to extrapolate to the gen pop 
from, because the testing has not been randomly done across gen pop!   The 
people who get tested typically are those who exhibit symptoms.   This may 
under guess the number who have gotten it OR over guess, but it's still NOT 
science.  
         He also neglects the effect of the quarantine actions on the results 
of the number of cases in his region.   Gee wilikers I want to hear the same 
information done from actual scientific method testing.   Then he says 
"hundreds of thousands of deaths which were inaccurate"...   Um we are over 54K 
deaths and the curve ISN'T going down.  It seems to have leveled off but is 
still going strong.   In basically 1.5 months.  We are 1/4+ the way to the 
model with social distancing.   Without social distancing we could start making 
a gain on the other models.       I think this is yet another example of 
someone, this time a doctor, who looks at the results of successful social 
distancing and says it's overreaction.   And then he talks about 0.1% of death 
and then 92% recovery.   Um doesn't that sound like 8% who DON'T recover?   And 
if you throw 8% at the hospitals of the population in a much shorter time from 
not social distancing, what happens to the hospitals?     Sorry but this is an 
"agenda" again...

    IT'S NOT LIKE THE FLU!


    On 4/26/20 7:34 AM, James Howard wrote:

      
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xfLVxx_lBLU&feature=youtu.be&fbclid=IwAR2Z1n4E0sxMyXc82UZxrXNKJqf9oaC_kF53Be6NZaVPnuP8jwTDKxk5w4g

       

       

       

      From: AF [mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com] On Behalf Of Ken Hohhof
      Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2020 8:13 AM
      To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' mailto:af@af.afmug.com
      Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Dang, not normal

       

      Steve, the usual solution is for nervous dwelling beings to engage in 
“spring cleaning”, to the annoyance of all other dwelling beings.

       

      https://www.gocomics.com/breaking-cat-news/2020/04/26

       

       

      From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> On Behalf Of Steve Jones
      Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2020 12:27 AM
      To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com>
      Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Dang, not normal

       

      I just reread that and am going to have to call a lent. Sorry

       

      On Sun, Apr 26, 2020, 12:19 AM Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> 
wrote:

        That's another thing that really needs kicked to the curb, political 
correctness. This is serious business, and housewives get nervous. A nervous 
housewife can make a whole lot of bad decisions. Those bad decisions have real 
world consequenses that dont care about being politically correct. You can say 
house person if you want. Well maybe being, since son is in person, indicating 
Male, if a gender actually exists. And I guess house indicates some level of 
financial status.

        Would you feel better about "dwelling being". 

        "Keeping dwelling beings occupied and less nervous" does that make you 
feel better?

         

        Fyi, that's specifically the reason I have my wife, who is suffering 
severe post partum depression in the middle of the end of the world, looking 
for templates on making masks, so i dont come home to the real world 
consequense of my babies drown in the bathtub. I'm not quite sure if her doing 
that would be PC or not.

         

        On Sat, Apr 25, 2020, 11:56 PM Bruce Robertson <br...@pooh.com> wrote:

          “keeping housewives occupied and less nervous”

           

          Really?  You’re aware this is 2020, right?

           

            On Apr 25, 2020, at 8:18 PM, Steve Jones 
<thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:

            

            You asked

             

            What was recomended by the White House. Regional opening with 
result driven response. (Without rhetoric, example, my county TRIPLED its cases 
over the weekend. It went from 1 to 3, the 2 new ones are related, so the 
increase is pretty irrelevant.) Tracing is more important than testing. That's 
just a matter of fact, testing is a slice in time, you can be infected, and 
test negative if you were recently infected, you can get infected at a test 
site. You can test positive from an environmental exposure without having 
actually caught it. It's like MRSA of the nairs. 

             

            Once identified, the tracing leads back to likely hotspots. I'd 
personally put the bulk of the funding into tracing. Use every bit of data 
volunteered. Particularly request the tracking data from mobile devices. If its 
volunteered, you have a map. If they dont, well, you work with what you have.

            "Testing" is a tool of politics. The only way to effectively test 
would be real time monitoring. Which A. Doesnt exist and B. Wouldn't be 
feasible.

             

            The governors each now have in their possession the location of 
every single test processing facility in the nation. So what little relevance 
testing actually plays in management is their responsibility to delegate 
coordination. So it's a moot issue.

             

            Any location exposed in tracing gets a mandatory scrub scrub (to be 
honest, I dont understand any public venue that wouldn't be surface 
decontaminating once ever 24 hours minimum anyway, there's no shortage of 
killitol level disinfectants)

             

            I think the mandatory face covering is nonsense. If it were 
mandatory rated filtration masks that would be different. 

            But there isnt a production capacity for that on the entire planet. 
But since it makes people feel like they're doing something, I'm all for it. 
Placebo is actually a powerful medication for much of what ails society. Plus 
the homemade masks are keeping housewives occupied and less nervous. That 
actually matters.

             

            Occasionally a tracing may require a mandatory compensated closure. 
Example being a county here in illinois that has a processor who has over 20 
employees infected, they're still operational. There is autonomy and 
constitutional rights, and then there is stupidity and a true public health 
risk. That falls under the latter and should be closed pending decontamination.

             

            A forcible closure, from a document able and legitimate public 
health risk should require medical screening of all staff/administration prior 
to resuming activities. There is no shortage of available healthcare 
practitioners right now, so depts of public health can contract that . Once 
again, the focus should be on tracing. Heavily funded tracing. "Patient zero" 
in the above mentioned case has probably long since recovered. Tracing is where 
they are identified, as theyll test negative now. Cases like this are where 
antibody testing should be prioritized, assuming there is consent.

             

            Tracing

             

            The same applies to public venues. If tracing identifies probable 
contamination, the venue scrubs. Applicable staff are cleared, tracing, tracing 
tracing. Video surveillance has a huge role where it is voluntarily submitted. 
Voluntarily being key and subjective, since it will be a whole lot quicker to  
clear a location of all tracing resources are made readily available. Call it 
extortion if you want, it is what it is, and it is a tool.

             

            Metrics must be clearly defined. If two people happenned to have 
been in the same place, it doesnt need to necessarily be shut down. But the 
threshold must be clearly defined. We have very little that is clearly defined. 
That has a whole lot to do with the defiance. Selling seeds being a prime 
example, at no point did illinois shut that down, yet places cordoned them off 
and facebook images went nuts. This is literally the same thing that cause the 
rapid spread in the US, images of empty shelves. Many of the people protesting 
still dont know that nurseries and greenhouses were specifically deemed 
essential last week, but that's why they're there. Clearly define everything, 
on the state and county websites. Accurate information is critical. That and 
tracing.

             

            Define regional thresholds for stages of opening. If a region 
declines, shut it down. If a region does well, progress the stages. Exactly as 
the feds recommend. 

             

            Define and justify every single essential and non essential 
industry. With a mandatory state clarification within 24 hours of a designation 
request. Justify being key. And publicly accessible designations. This would be 
fluid and ongoing. 

             

            Leisure activities need designations. Nuclear family needs 
clarification. As it reads, I cant take my family fishing in illinois because 
the designated limit is 2. This will get police in situations with bad outcomes 
because nobody bothered to clarify.

             

            If a region's medical resources are verifiably and documented to be 
taxed to a predefined and clearly defined level, then ease back on the stages, 
all the way to lockdown if need be. But media reports and public opinion arent 
the metrics. The staffing levels and documented patient loads define that.

             

             

            I can continue 

             

             

             

             

             

            On Sat, Apr 25, 2020, 9:01 PM Chuck Macenski <ch...@macenski.com> 
wrote:

              Would you please articulate specifically "what is right" in this 
situation? I am asking for your non-political opinion of the most constructive 
way forward. 

               

              On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 8:24 PM Steve Jones 
<thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:

                I sit back and watch as people contradict their own statements. 
"Its going to be here like this for years" "tests are growing, as is the 
number" "it's been here longer than we think" "it hasn't peaked because muh 
testing" "it's going to be worse in fall" "mitigation has had a major impact" 

                The best is regarding the medication mien fuehrer  liked. "Its 
only anecdotal" "a tiny group had a negative outcome, thisnis the gold standard 
and this drug must be banned"

                 

                I live in a state where our governor is in a pissing contest 
with the White House, but doing pretty much what the White House recommends, 
with the exception of looking at things by region. We only have two regions, 
chicago, and people who voted for the current president at 1600. So the whole 
of downstate will be punished for not voting the right way. When asked about 
the data, for the "science" behind this, we were told the state doesnt own the 
data, so we cant see it.

                 

                I'm part of a foster parent group. One of the fosters is 
utterly destroyed right now. Her prior ward, that she stayed in contact with 
died 3 days ago at 15. He had returned home, but went back into the system 
during this (our state, in its infinite wisdom has effectively shut down the 
foster support system, non essential and all) he couldn't come back to her 
because she is at capacity. He had cancer and was in a drug trial. He had been 
thriving. The governors orders didnt allow for him to get access to the trial 
resources, so he lost his trial spot, as is the nature of trials. There were no 
resources available to get him into a linear treatment. 3 days ago he succumbed 
to the complication. While anecdotal, this is exactly what the cure being worse 
than the disease looks like. Granted, the speed at which he declined from 
thriving to dead indicates underlying issues, the chicago emperors orders made 
certain there were no resources. Right now, thanks to the emperors orders, 
there are approximately zero resources available to the foster families. 
Anticipate a whole lot of negative outcomes. 

                 

                Point is, everybody is more concerned about proving how wrong 
their political enemy is, that nobody is even actually looking for what is 
right. 

                 

                Thankfully mother nature doesnt care and this will, like all 
ailments of proximity, diminish in the next week or so.

                 

                On Sat, Apr 25, 2020, 5:48 PM Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> 
wrote:

                  Just listened (in part) to a discussion about COVID-19 as it 
regards China/US relations. It is a discussion between Dubner, Michèle Flournoy 
( former undersecretary of defense and co-founder of strategic-advisory firm 
WestExec.), and Michael Auslin (historian at Stanford University’s Hoover 
Institution). 

                  Within the discussion Auslin asserts that the death toll 
within Wuhan alone was between 45 and 47 thousand; at least 10X what they have 
reported through official channels. He gets his data through croudsourcing 
crematoria activity and the number of people picking up urns of deceased family 
members.

                  If you don't have time to listen to this, it is at least 
worth a read of the transcript.

                    https://freakonomics.com/podcast/covid-19-china/

                     

bp<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> On 4/25/2020 3:11 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote:

                    This virus doesn't care if you are a Republican, a 
Democrat, an Independent, agnostic, religious or an atheist...if it gets you it 
might kill you... 

                    Stay smart, listen to doctors and scientists....not ineptus 
maximus politicians. 

                     

                    On Sat, Apr 25, 2020, 12:45 PM Bill Prince 
<part15...@gmail.com> wrote:

                      As we test more, we are undoubtedly going to find more 
cases that were previously going undetected (asymptomatic infection). This is a 
long way from over. The other thing we have not come to grips with is the 
uneven spread/mitigation. 

                      There was an interesting graphic for the state of 
California showing the state as a whole versus just the Bay Area (Mercury News 
this morning). The 7 counties around the bay instituted shelter in place very 
early, and it's beginning to show in the statistics. The Bay Area accounts for 
almost 18% of the entire state population (7 of the 40 million).

                       

                       

bp<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> On 4/25/2020 8:45 AM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:

                         

                         

                        Might be Chebyshev BPF though... hopefully...Bessell.  

                        Hopefully not high pass...

                         

                      -- 
                      AF mailing list
                      AF@af.afmug.com
                      http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

                     

                  -- 
                  AF mailing list
                  AF@af.afmug.com
                  http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

                -- 
                AF mailing list
                AF@af.afmug.com
                http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

              -- 
              AF mailing list
              AF@af.afmug.com
              http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

            !DSPAM:5ea4fd705986622617646! -- 
            AF mailing list
            AF@af.afmug.com
            http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


            !DSPAM:5ea4fd705986622617646!

          -- 
          AF mailing list
          AF@af.afmug.com
          http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


--------------------------------------------------------------------------

                  Total Control Panel
                 Login
                 
           
                        To: ja...@litewire.net
                       
                        From: af-boun...@af.afmug.com
                       
                 
                       
                 
           
                  You received this message because the domain afmug.com is on 
your allow list.
                 
           

       


       


     

   




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to