You are the scum of the earth if you are a wikipedia editor. Consensus reality.. brought to you by mainly extremely authoritarian and narrow minded nerds.
-- Steven Kenney Network Operations Manager WaveDirect Telecommunications http://www.wavedirect.net (519)737-WAVE (9283) From: "Steve Jones" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> To: "af" <af@af.afmug.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2020 2:57:36 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Is this good? look at the changelog for fascism at wikipedia. Its a shame too, wikipedia used to be one of the most reliable sources for quick and dirty info. now it takes a grain of salt. I used to donate when they did their donate popup On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 1:52 PM < [ mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com | ch...@wbmfg.com ] > wrote: This is starting to get into lent. I will say, the snopes articles that I have researched after being told they were biased, were slightly biased. Just slightly but I did not consider them as fair and balanced as they would like people to believe. I used to really enjoy and use snopes. But then my alt-right son told me about a few cases to take a close look at. And he was right. I did not have the same conclusions as he did that they are terribly biased with an agenda etc etc. After that though I did read their stuff with a bit of a jaundiced eye. It was clear they chose to ignore or discount evidence favorable to the right but they don’t do the same, or at least not the the same degree to the left. If they give the benefit of the doubt, the benefit seemingly always swings left instead of right most of the time. If they have a choice on how to couch a response, they choose words that tend to make the left look better than the right. From: Carl Peterson Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2020 12:34 PM To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Is this good? I am always amazed at how disconnected the far right can be from what I think is reality. Snopes is fact based and Wikipedia as a whole is pretty darn unbiased. Just because you don't like facts doesn't make them biased. On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 1:00 PM Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: BQ_BEGIN I cant help but laugh when wikipedia is used to decipher neutrality. sadly, its one step above snopes anymore. -- AF mailing list [ mailto:AF@af.afmug.com | AF@af.afmug.com ] [ http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com | http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com ] -- AF mailing list [ mailto:AF@af.afmug.com | AF@af.afmug.com ] [ http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com | http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com ] BQ_END -- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
