The guy with the phat bling

On Fri, Dec 11, 2020, 11:34 PM Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:

> Who are the left of which you speak?  Do they walk among us?
>
>
>
> [image: A picture containing person, person Description automatically
> generated]
>
>
>
> *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones
> *Sent:* Friday, December 11, 2020 11:23 PM
> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT: Not all Texans are idiots
>
>
>
> Hence the next statement in what I said
>
> There hasnt been any ruling, so there isnt any finality. There needs to be
> finality. Scotus action today is just going to drag this thing out. Until
> they do their job, hear the case, rule against the states, the propensity
> for violence increases daily. And I'm not just talking about secessionists.
>
> At least the next 2 years wont be anything like the left over the last
> four still calling Clinton madame president and screaming at the sky. The
> right will either pop off or move on. More likely to move on if the scotus
> does their job and rules on it.
>
>
>
> It's a real good forecast for starlink, the left lives funding a monopoly
> they back. I'll bet scotus rules on that within 3 years, they wont claim
> it's not in their wheelhouse
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020, 9:54 PM Chuck McCown via AF <af@af.afmug.com> wrote:
>
> Appeal to whom?  God?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
>
> On Dec 11, 2020, at 7:42 PM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> 
>
> Statement of Justice Alito, with whom Justice Thomas joins:
>
> In my view, we do not have discretion to deny the filing of a
>
> bill of complaint in a case that falls within our original
>
> jurisdiction. See Arizona v. California, 589 U. S. ___
>
> (Feb. 24, 2020) (Thomas, J., dissenting). I would therefore
>
> grant the motion to file the bill of complaint but would not
>
> grant other relief, and I express no view on any other issue.
>
>
>
> I'll break this down for bill and jaime to understand. The case itself is
> in the purview of SCOTUS. By not hearing it (and issuing a negative ruling
> on the merits, as the tone reflects) the issue would have been ended, also
> likely ending the other pending cases. All theyve done now is created a
> mechanism to appeal or refile, and refile, and refile. Irrelevant of the
> 14th december , the 3rd, or the 20th of January.
>
>
>
> You have two choices when your kids are fighting (you're kids are always
> your jurisdiction) you can tell the "I dont want to hear it" and spend the
> next few days listening to them bicker.
>
> Or you can have them tell you their gripes, then tell them to fuck off
> with a descriptive reason why, with clarity that if it comes before you
> again, the hand of god will strike them.
>
>
>
> Ultimately both outcomes are the same (they get sidetracked and move on to
> the next shiny object) only one is clear, and one leaves the door open for
> endless stupidity.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020, 8:26 PM Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Read the dissent, it's a lot less elementary school than "nyah nyah
> pbthhh" and sticking fingers in the air
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020, 7:32 PM Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> If I was on the court (and to be clear, I am not, nor do I want to be), I
> would have denied the case with prejudice.
>
>
>
> Time for the followers of Trumpianity to find another church, and face
> reality.
>
>
> --
>
> bp
>
> part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 4:20 PM Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> All these craven lackeys got a big fuck you from the SCOTUS...
>
>
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to