Rotflmao, and let the games begin

https://www.forbes.com/sites/andrewsolender/2020/12/11/house-democrat-calls-to-exclude-126-republicans-from-next-congress-for-supporting-texas-lawsuit/

On Fri, Dec 11, 2020, 11:45 PM Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> The guy with the phat bling
>
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020, 11:34 PM Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:
>
>> Who are the left of which you speak?  Do they walk among us?
>>
>>
>>
>> [image: A picture containing person, person Description automatically
>> generated]
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones
>> *Sent:* Friday, December 11, 2020 11:23 PM
>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com>
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT: Not all Texans are idiots
>>
>>
>>
>> Hence the next statement in what I said
>>
>> There hasnt been any ruling, so there isnt any finality. There needs to
>> be finality. Scotus action today is just going to drag this thing out.
>> Until they do their job, hear the case, rule against the states, the
>> propensity for violence increases daily. And I'm not just talking about
>> secessionists.
>>
>> At least the next 2 years wont be anything like the left over the last
>> four still calling Clinton madame president and screaming at the sky. The
>> right will either pop off or move on. More likely to move on if the scotus
>> does their job and rules on it.
>>
>>
>>
>> It's a real good forecast for starlink, the left lives funding a monopoly
>> they back. I'll bet scotus rules on that within 3 years, they wont claim
>> it's not in their wheelhouse
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020, 9:54 PM Chuck McCown via AF <af@af.afmug.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Appeal to whom?  God?
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>
>>
>> On Dec 11, 2020, at 7:42 PM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> 
>>
>> Statement of Justice Alito, with whom Justice Thomas joins:
>>
>> In my view, we do not have discretion to deny the filing of a
>>
>> bill of complaint in a case that falls within our original
>>
>> jurisdiction. See Arizona v. California, 589 U. S. ___
>>
>> (Feb. 24, 2020) (Thomas, J., dissenting). I would therefore
>>
>> grant the motion to file the bill of complaint but would not
>>
>> grant other relief, and I express no view on any other issue.
>>
>>
>>
>> I'll break this down for bill and jaime to understand. The case itself is
>> in the purview of SCOTUS. By not hearing it (and issuing a negative ruling
>> on the merits, as the tone reflects) the issue would have been ended, also
>> likely ending the other pending cases. All theyve done now is created a
>> mechanism to appeal or refile, and refile, and refile. Irrelevant of the
>> 14th december , the 3rd, or the 20th of January.
>>
>>
>>
>> You have two choices when your kids are fighting (you're kids are always
>> your jurisdiction) you can tell the "I dont want to hear it" and spend the
>> next few days listening to them bicker.
>>
>> Or you can have them tell you their gripes, then tell them to fuck off
>> with a descriptive reason why, with clarity that if it comes before you
>> again, the hand of god will strike them.
>>
>>
>>
>> Ultimately both outcomes are the same (they get sidetracked and move on
>> to the next shiny object) only one is clear, and one leaves the door open
>> for endless stupidity.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020, 8:26 PM Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Read the dissent, it's a lot less elementary school than "nyah nyah
>> pbthhh" and sticking fingers in the air
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020, 7:32 PM Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> If I was on the court (and to be clear, I am not, nor do I want to be), I
>> would have denied the case with prejudice.
>>
>>
>>
>> Time for the followers of Trumpianity to find another church, and face
>> reality.
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> bp
>>
>> part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 4:20 PM Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> All these craven lackeys got a big fuck you from the SCOTUS...
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to