Dismissing with prejudice wont address any of the other multitude pending.
It also opens up the door, as noted by alito. The courts can't say it's not
their problem, when case law says otherwise. That's the angle they will
probably come back at. The court at some point is going to have to attack
the political consequense they're trying to avoid eventually, get it done
now rather than later, there is only so much synapse left in my texan
friend, and eventually I'm gonna need his advice on laying out DIN
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020, 8:45 PM Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
> That was my point. It was not quite forceful enough for my taste.
> Dismissing with prejudice makes the point more forceful without getting
> into schoolyard name calling.
>
> --
> bp
> part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 6:27 PM Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Read the dissent, it's a lot less elementary school than "nyah nyah
>> pbthhh" and sticking fingers in the air
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020, 7:32 PM Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> If I was on the court (and to be clear, I am not, nor do I want to be),
>>> I would have denied the case with prejudice.
>>>
>>> Time for the followers of Trumpianity to find another church, and face
>>> reality.
>>>
>>> --
>>> bp
>>> part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 4:20 PM Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> All these craven lackeys got a big fuck you from the SCOTUS...
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> AF mailing list
>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
