On Wed, Dec 16, 2020, 9:02 PM Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So now theyve moved on to a 100 year old law (wtf is this law about?
> Really look it up, jaime, I'm curious) that let's any Congress person
> complaint, and then theres 2 hours debate, butnif two hours debate happens
> and a red dog walks through a cheerio on tuesday wit a left hip limp... I
> think rush may have imbibed on morphine.
> Anyway, we are finally to the point where the right is almost ready to be
> 10 percent as annoying as the left for the last 4 years (hows that mrs
> president?)
> Seriously, let's just start shooting
>
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020, 1:13 PM Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I agree with that. While many (most?) commenters are marveling at the
>> huge voter turnout, it should be noted that an approximate 80 million chose
>> to sit out this election.
>>
>> There is probably an opportunity in there somewhere for anyone who can
>> figure out how to get these people out from under their rocks.
>>
>>
>> bp
>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>
>> On 12/14/2020 6:26 PM, Lewis Bergman wrote:
>>
>> I think you underestimate the apathy of most Americans
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020, 4:55 PM Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Scotus is unique in that they arent elected, they ha e a wide berth of
>>> discretion, they are the literal last line prior to violent engagement. So,
>>> say the feds want to add a tea tax on Massachusetts. Massachusetts says
>>> hey, I'm harmed by this. Without a hearing the court says, nope, no merit.
>>> Massachusetts says, hey now, we really think you should hear us out.
>>> Discretion being the key.
>>>
>>> We are at the point of a harbor being a tea kettle in close to 40
>>> million of the most heavily armed people on the planets minds . Whether
>>> what they think is real, or make believe, it is what it is, and their
>>> communications have been forced out of the public's surveillance, so you
>>> never know what they're going to do next. They're not the kind who wear
>>> black clothes, masks, and disappear right after they do something cowardly
>>> like beat an old man in a wheelchair. They also believe the italian guy
>>> pretending to be latino wasnt kidding.
>>>
>>> Either way
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020, 4:19 PM Carl Peterson <cpeter...@portnetworks.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm not exactly clear as to the train of thought, or even what
>>>> case/issue the SC should hear out. The "case" argued in public is nothing
>>>> like anything presented in any court. It isn't like Trump's
>>>> lawyers weren't given an opportunity. Q. Are you alleging fraud? A.
>>>> No. Well OK then. You can't then go to the PA supreme court and allege
>>>> fraud. When the PA supreme court declines to let you, you can't go to the
>>>> SC and do the same. They will rightly tell you to pound sand. This basic
>>>> script played out over and over again.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 3:49 PM Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> If I'm following Steve's train of thought: he's saying giving the
>>>>> issue a day in court might convince some people that justice was done more
>>>>> effectively than simply dismissing the case. An independent judiciary
>>>>> shouldn't have to consider political angles like that. The cases are
>>>>> being
>>>>> dismissed because they lack standing and/or lack merit. If that doesn't
>>>>> convince people, then neither would taking the case to court and losing
>>>>> it.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> AF mailing list
>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
