I'm not sure what you are asking Steve. I am forming multiple adjacencies with multiple /30 networks on the same interface for ECMP load balancing purposes on a few links.
On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 7:19 PM Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > are your routing IPs in a bridge with other IP addresses? > > On Wed, Jan 3, 2024, 10:09 AM castarritt <castarr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Had an odd issue last night. All 'tik OSPF routed network with routers >> at each tower site. Simple single area OSPF setup, no MPLS or other >> overlay, about 700 internal routes. Last night, some customers on APs >> connected to specific tower routers lost connection to the internet. Our >> monitoring system never lost connection to any of the customer SMs or >> anything else in our network, so no alarms were raised. The issue lasted a >> few hours overnight and recovered on its own without any of us getting to >> take a look at it. It is like the affected routers lost their dynamic >> default route. The affected routers appear to be randomly scattered around >> our network. They aren't all connected along the same backhaul paths, and >> in one case where we had two routers at a specific site, only one of the >> routers was affected. This happened at the tail end of a heavy rain storm >> that was causing a lot of OSPF topology changes as microwave links went in >> and out of service due to rain fade. >> >> Anyone else seen something like this? Is our routing table getting too >> big for 'tik to handle with a single OSPF area? >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
