With a name like WORP, it's got to be good!
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Hrbek (Loganet) via Af
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 1:26 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 100 beefy
Is the WORP stuff any good?
On Sep 17, 2014, at 1:25 PM, Ken Hohhof via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote:
I am guessing if anything, you will see Canopy (or at least 450) sync with
ePMP/320. Seems like it would be easier to make the FPGA based radio use
a longer frame than to make the Atheros based radio use a shorter frame.
I'm sure they already tried that.
-----Original Message----- From: Bill Prince via Af
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 1:03 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 100 beefy
George, you ought to be all over that new Proxim WORP stuff like white
on rice. They claim that it will sync with Canopy.
bp
On 9/17/2014 10:41 AM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af wrote:
Is that 2.4 or 5GHz? A couple weeks ago someone asked why the 2.4 AP
sector is slant and the integrated SMs are H/V. Cambium responded with an
explanation, something about the SM detecting phases and doing its thing.
Definitely looks like a Laird/Pac feed design. That has to be a pain to
weather seal.
When they get these things to sync with Canopy and get the PTP latency
down, then I'll buy some.
On 9/17/2014 9:22 AM, Greg Osborn via Af wrote:
We received our first shipment of ePMP Force 100's yesterday. Pretty
beefy at 10 lbs. Quite a curious angle on the feed horn N-type
connections.
It would lead you to believe the antenna system is dual slant. All the
specs say H&V.
