Still have 900 everywhere but it isn't suitable for a feed to another tower. Had a FSK 2.4 there before. Had a -61 signal
----- Original Message ----- From: "CBB - Jay Fuller via Af" <af@afmug.com> To: af@afmug.com Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2014 7:09:03 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 pmp450 results - was Dear Cambium Did you have 900 mhz there before? If so, what was the signal? If NOT, what did you have there before? ----- Original Message ----- From: Craig House via Af To: af@afmug.com Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2014 12:39 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 pmp450 results - was Dear Cambium Longest shot we have made work is 4.7 with a kP dish. -73 but link tests are not that great. 83/73 and it is in 4x I'm planning on removing all our 3.65 450 gear and going with 2.4 450. The power is much better but migration from FSK 2.4 is a bigger pain Sent from my iPhone On Sep 21, 2014, at 12:14, Ken Hohhof via Af < af@afmug.com > wrote: <blockquote> We did a bare SM the other day 0.6 miles –58 and 8X in a 10 MHz channel, that tells me we can go a lot farther without a dish, probably 1.5 miles or more. Or are you talking about through trees? I have not been impressed with performance through trees, even with a dish. But I’m not happy with –80 and 4X, I don’t want to eat up all the capacity on such an expensive piece of gear with just a few subs. And I don’t want customers calling every time the leaves get wet or covered with snow. At some point I think we’ll see something similar to the Force100 but for now it’s a dish or a connectorized SM with a panel. When I asked about a Stinger/CLIP type of product, I was told the size at 2.4 or 3.65 GHz get too big or else the gain isn’t worth it. From: CBB - Jay Fuller via Af Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2014 11:58 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 pmp450 results - was Dear Cambium We didn't get very far without a dish ; what are you seeing in terms of how far you can get before you have a dish? Are you using a dish with most, or is there a stinger available or something "mid-term" ? Must be honest, we haven't tried the dish yet. Need to very soon as fall is basically here... <blockquote> ----- Original Message ----- From: David Milholen via Af To: af@afmug.com Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2014 11:34 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Dear Cambium Chris, We are rockin 3.65 450 AB channels replacing 90% of our 900 subs. Migration is taking time due to cap X. I took down our first 900AP which was our first aP900 installed last week. On 9/19/2014 4:34 PM, Christopher Tyler via Af wrote: <blockquote> I love the 450, 450 is awesome, but 90% of our subs are on 900 MHz, what do we do there, where is our upgrade path, what is the replacement for PMP100 in 900 MHz? We have no alternative to 900 for most of our customers where we are, too many hills and trees. We are still deploying 900 MHz radios in large quantities simply because we can't use anything else. Sure would be nice to have an easy way to configure those radios, we (Animal Farm) have only been asking for that feature for the last 8 years, not like they didn't know about it or have the time to figure it out. Now they are giving it to us, but only on a platform where we don't really need it yet. While I understand that PMP100 is somewhat antiquated, Cambium is still making money on it and will continue to make money on it, so why not give us at least some development beyond bug fixes at least until there is a 900 replacement? Why not a 450 in 900 MHz that's using the newer hardware but still only 2x modulation. We would literally buy thousands of them within the next year. -- <Davidmvcf.jpg> </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote>
