but i do really like the interface on the 650
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 7:04 PM, That One Guy
<thatoneguyst...@gmail.com <mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>> wrote:
This is really beginning to irritate me, Now the guy who replaced
the gear is still blaming us for the problems here, I moved the
ubnt gear clear down to like 5.1 or whatever the lowest channel
is, the spectrum at this and the remote site are deplorable.
The Signal/Noise ratio is moving around on the ptp650 and the
Vector Errors are off the chart, but he still wants to blame our
equipment.
I can tell you it boils down to an improper system repair post
disaster. I pulled screen shots, both before and after I moved our
channels, showed them the issue with their own colocated radios,
turned on assymetric channels, yes, they were running symmetric in
a high noise environment, nothing could go wrong there, right?
Now tomorrow, my boss is going there to unplug our radio, taking
our customers down. Im betting some utter nonsense like capacitant
power or our antenna shape ends up being to blame here.
I know ubnt is shit and bleeds noise allover, this particular
radio is a rocket m5 with the 30db dish and the shield kit. The
link is 90 degrees off both of theirs (ours is west, they have one
north and one south) I believe we have 30 foot vertical sep
between it and their closest radio. I can see how a rocket would
magically destroy the whole 5ghz spectrum and not have performance
issues itself.I even cycled the UBNT radios to make sure that they
actually did change channels.
ATPC power ranging not matching current TX output and RX doesnt
make any sense to me. Interference alone will not alter RX power
unless its very very notable.
And then to top it off its said it would be better to move
completely off the band to 3ghz since it cant interfere. Yeah,
great fucking idea, lets take the only semi clean spectrum left
and burn it on a backhaul thats performing as it should because
other people dont know how to troubleshoot their own damn gear.
But the kicker to that would be "oh, you must still be
interfering, that m365 is actually a 5ghz radio downconverted
how bout this, climb the damn tower and fix the fuckup
fucking meh
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 5:04 PM, That One Guy via Af <af@afmug.com
<mailto:af@afmug.com>> wrote:
Im not doing anything, this is a not my chair not my problem
issue.
This strike blew everything on the tower, if it was
electronic, it cooked, the switch was sitting on back of the
APC and welded to it even tripped the breaker
Im just curious with these if theres any issue with the ATPC
on these bas boys
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 4:42 PM, David via Af <af@afmug.com
<mailto:af@afmug.com>> wrote:
Inspect the cables or at lease switch one or both out at
one end and see if a prevalent change is made.
Could be a feed horn but unlikely I would shoot for
pigtails first.
On 09/23/2014 02:38 PM, That One Guy via Af wrote:
I just got done troubleshooting a 650 link for our
landlord we are coloed with on a couple towers. I had not
looked at the ptp interface since the 500.
This thing is freaking beautiful, and I never compliment
anybody, especially on a web gui.
Sooooo much information, so easy to find.
one question though, They have atpc set to -35 on these,
does that basically turn atpc off, or could it cause a
problem?
Im pretty sure they have a loose antenna or damaged
feedhorn/patch cables (this was a lighnting replacement
of a ptp500, reusing the cables/feedhorn)
The system statistics showed a variation of received
power ranging from -47 to -78 with a peak of -110 ,
-78ish being current. Transmit powers show a variation of
-15dBm up to 21 dBm (I did not notice the negative value
at first). This would account for the range of Received
power except When the Status screenshots were taken, the
transmit power on both units was at 21 dBm with a 77/78
receive power on each side. If the output power is
accurate, the receive power on the remote end would be at
the peak, not the mean.
--
All parts should go together without forcing. You must
remember that the parts you are reassembling were
disassembled by you. Therefore, if you can't get them
together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do
not use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925
--
All parts should go together without forcing. You must
remember that the parts you are reassembling were disassembled
by you. Therefore, if you can't get them together again, there
must be a reason. By all means, do not use a hammer. -- IBM
maintenance manual, 1925
--
All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember
that the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you.
Therefore, if you can't get them together again, there must be a
reason. By all means, do not use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance
manual, 1925
--
All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that
the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if
you can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all
means, do not use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925
