Well can't they use tiny channels and focus all the power in say a 5 MHz channel to make that distance carry the little traffic they expect?
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Oct 4, 2014 12:51 PM, "Mike Hammett via Af" <af@afmug.com> wrote: > They do have one that is dual 5 GHz, though. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Gino Villarini via Af" <af@afmug.com> > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Saturday, October 4, 2014 8:28:54 AM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] 450 sector > > No cause its dual band... not quad pol. > > > > Gino A. Villarini > President > Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. > www.aeronetpr.com > @aeronetpr > > > > > > > On 10/3/14, 5:29 PM, "Josh Baird via Af" <af@afmug.com> wrote: > > >Can't you do this on the ITElite dual band sectors? > > > >> On Oct 3, 2014, at 5:25 PM, Gino Villarini via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote: > >> > >> > >> Alpha antennas makes a quad pol sectorŠ hmm 450 + epmp? > >> > >> > >> Gino A. Villarini > >> President > >> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. > >> www.aeronetpr.com > >> @aeronetpr > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>> On 10/3/14, 5:18 PM, "Adam Moffett via Af" <af@afmug.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> We're actually really liking the 450 sector with the third 10dbi > >>> connector. We first used it to put connectorized FSK radios on the > >>> tower without adding another antenna. Since then we've discussed using > >>> it with ePMP or other products just to have the third connector for > >>> other uses. We like the idea that we can sneak another single polarity > >>> 5.4 or 5.7 radio up without much fuss. > >>> > >>> I was wondering if they're going to keep making that antenna even > >>>though > >>> the FSK compatibility never worked out. Has the rumor mill heard > >>> anything about it going away or not? Any official word from Cambium? > >> > > >
