Can you rob a bank, just to see what it feels like? On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 6:57 PM, That One Guy via Af <[email protected]> wrote:
> anybody? > testing is still not legal, right? > > On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 7:39 PM, That One Guy via Af <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Given my recent tyrade about obeying the regulations >> >> I know I could have changed what the antenna size is in the GUI and the >> 5.2 band would have given me more output power to test this link. I knwo it >> boils down to me being a dick about it, that I dont question. But when it >> comes down to it, am I correct that we cant even "test" outside our power >> restrictions? I know the FCC isnt driving around in vans looking for people >> overpowering a radio for 20 minutes, its not about getting caught, its >> about principle. >> Are we allowed to do temporary things like that for testing purposes? I >> assume that as a letter of law we would have to have prior approval from >> the FCC, would we not? >> >> >> (This boils down to CYA over the ass chewing im pretty sure is on the way >> monday for not doing "whatever it takes" to get a critical link to full >> capacity, which I did last year when I specced out and sourced a licensed >> solution for the path) >> >> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 5:56 PM, That One Guy via Af <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> my cambium guy said there wouldnt be an answer right now, so im packing >>> this up and saying fuck all this noise, im goin drinkin >>> >>> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Matt Jenkins via Af <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I would call support at this point. +1-888-863-5250 >>>> >>>> Matthew Jenkins >>>> SmarterBroadband >>>> [email protected] >>>> 530.272.4000 >>>> >>>> On 10/24/2014 03:36 PM, That One Guy via Af wrote: >>>> >>>>> yes I did >>>>> >>>>> the spectrum is shit, I knew this going into it >>>>> I unlocket the full throughput eval now >>>>> its going above 5 >>>>> but by 5x5 I mean 5.00 x 5.00 with 2:1 1:1 1:2, on every channel, on >>>>> every channel size not 4.96 x 5.01 flat out 5.00 x 5.00 I have never seen >>>>> a >>>>> ptp stay at a single number like that >>>>> While we were peaking it out it was running up where it was expected >>>>> aggregate around 19 or something >>>>> this didnt start until I switched bands >>>>> I went to 5.4 it was where it was expected for a 10.3 mile link >>>>> I went to 5.2 when I went here I switched to the biggest channel, >>>>> thats when it started 5.00 x 5.00 >>>>> Switched back to 5.8 had to move the transmit power back to 27 from -4 >>>>> 5.00 x 5.00, no matter the channel size >>>>> >>>>> Im guessing this is a bug, what im wondering is if it corrupted the >>>>> generic lite key or something like that when its in the trial it ignores >>>>> the key >>>>> >>>>> anybody know what happens if theres no good key? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Matt Jenkins via Af <[email protected] >>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Did you Disarm the Installation Agent? >>>>> >>>>> Matthew Jenkins >>>>> SmarterBroadband >>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>>>> 530.272.4000 <tel:530.272.4000> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 10/24/2014 02:54 PM, That One Guy via Af wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I'm running out of daylight. Has anybody come across this >>>>> before? Was modulating higher. I switched to 5.4 then 5.2 then >>>>> back to 5.8 now it won't go above 5x5 on any channel size >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that >>>>> the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you >>>>> can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do >>>>> not >>>>> use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925 >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the >>> parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you >>> can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not >>> use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925 >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the >> parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you >> can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not >> use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925 >> > > > > -- > All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the > parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you > can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not > use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925 >
