anybody?
testing is still not legal, right?
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 7:39 PM, That One Guy via Af <af@afmug.com
<mailto:af@afmug.com>> wrote:
Given my recent tyrade about obeying the regulations
I know I could have changed what the antenna size is in the GUI
and the 5.2 band would have given me more output power to test
this link. I knwo it boils down to me being a dick about it, that
I dont question. But when it comes down to it, am I correct that
we cant even "test" outside our power restrictions? I know the
FCC isnt driving around in vans looking for people overpowering a
radio for 20 minutes, its not about getting caught, its about
principle.
Are we allowed to do temporary things like that for testing
purposes? I assume that as a letter of law we would have to have
prior approval from the FCC, would we not?
(This boils down to CYA over the ass chewing im pretty sure is on
the way monday for not doing "whatever it takes" to get a
critical link to full capacity, which I did last year when I
specced out and sourced a licensed solution for the path)
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 5:56 PM, That One Guy via Af
<af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>> wrote:
my cambium guy said there wouldnt be an answer right now, so
im packing this up and saying fuck all this noise, im goin
drinkin
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Matt Jenkins via Af
<af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>> wrote:
I would call support at this point. +1-888-863-5250
<tel:%2B1-888-863-5250>
Matthew Jenkins
SmarterBroadband
m...@sbbinc.net <mailto:m...@sbbinc.net>
530.272.4000 <tel:530.272.4000>
On 10/24/2014 03:36 PM, That One Guy via Af wrote:
yes I did
the spectrum is shit, I knew this going into it
I unlocket the full throughput eval now
its going above 5
but by 5x5 I mean 5.00 x 5.00 with 2:1 1:1 1:2, on
every channel, on every channel size not 4.96 x 5.01
flat out 5.00 x 5.00 I have never seen a ptp stay at
a single number like that
While we were peaking it out it was running up where
it was expected aggregate around 19 or something
this didnt start until I switched bands
I went to 5.4 it was where it was expected for a 10.3
mile link
I went to 5.2 when I went here I switched to the
biggest channel, thats when it started 5.00 x 5.00
Switched back to 5.8 had to move the transmit power
back to 27 from -4
5.00 x 5.00, no matter the channel size
Im guessing this is a bug, what im wondering is if it
corrupted the generic lite key or something like that
when its in the trial it ignores the key
anybody know what happens if theres no good key?
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Matt Jenkins via Af
<af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
<mailto:af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>>> wrote:
Did you Disarm the Installation Agent?
Matthew Jenkins
SmarterBroadband
m...@sbbinc.net <mailto:m...@sbbinc.net>
<mailto:m...@sbbinc.net <mailto:m...@sbbinc.net>>
530.272.4000 <tel:530.272.4000> <tel:530.272.4000
<tel:530.272.4000>>
On 10/24/2014 02:54 PM, That One Guy via Af wrote:
I'm running out of daylight. Has anybody come
across this
before? Was modulating higher. I switched to
5.4 then 5.2 then
back to 5.8 now it won't go above 5x5 on any
channel size
--
All parts should go together without forcing. You
must remember that the parts you are reassembling
were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you can't get
them together again, there must be a reason. By all
means, do not use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance
manual, 1925
--
All parts should go together without forcing. You must
remember that the parts you are reassembling were
disassembled by you. Therefore, if you can't get them
together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not
use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925
--
All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember
that the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you.
Therefore, if you can't get them together again, there must be a
reason. By all means, do not use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance
manual, 1925
--
All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that
the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore,
if you can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all
means, do not use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925