You're correct Seth, there is a difference between the envelope sender and the mail from address.In the case of DMARC, it requires that the envelope sender domain match that of the dkim domain and that of the mail from domain to achieve what they call alignment.
I can't recall who did the move, but they chose option number 3a here: http://www.dmarc.org/faq.html#s_3 I agree, not seeing the original sender's email addy isn't ideal. From a mail sending stand point, the list is doing it correct (in my opinion) but it does make it a little less usable. And on a side note, next time I'm in Tahoe, I'd love to buy you a beer and talk about TahoeIX. I love the idea of smaller IX's like that and would love to see/hear what you guys are doing. Robbie Wright Siuslaw Broadband <http://siuslawbroadband.com> 541-902-5101 On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 9:09 AM, Seth Mattinen via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote: > On 10/31/14, 8:33, Robbie Wright via Af wrote: > >> I wasn't involved in the move of the mailing list at all, but this was a >> needed thing. Since all of you should have SPF records on your domain, >> when the mailing list program attempted to send mail with your from >> address, it should have been picked up by spam filters because it was >> coming from the AMFUG server which most likely wasn't authorized in your >> SPF record. With the combination of SPF, DKIM, and now DMARC, mailing >> lists cannot (and shouldn't) fake people's from email address. How the >> team that did the move completed this is technically correct. The >> sender's name is great but you have to use the right domain. >> > > > No, just no. Know the difference between the sender and the envelope > sender. > > ~Seth >
