U verse sucks. Stay away Jaime Solorza On Dec 8, 2014 12:00 PM, "Jason McKemie via Af" <af@afmug.com> wrote:
> I've got a consulting client that just had their service switched over > from standard AT&T DSL to U-verse. In the process, AT&T replaced the modem > / router. The new unit that they issued does not have the ability to > disable DHCP, which is necessary for this application as there is another > DHCP server on the network. This is probably a fairly unique situation, as > most routers that I've seen have the ability to disable DHCP, how the > hardware manufacturer overlooked this is beyond me. Any suggestions on > work-arounds? I had thought about putting a Mikrotik (or other router) in > between their switch and the AT&T box and just doing double-nat, but wanted > to see if there was a better way. TIA. > > -Jason >
