I didn't make the call, but I do have to fix the problem. On Monday, December 8, 2014, Jaime Solorza via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote:
> U verse sucks. Stay away > > Jaime Solorza > On Dec 8, 2014 12:00 PM, "Jason McKemie via Af" <af@afmug.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af@afmug.com');>> wrote: > >> I've got a consulting client that just had their service switched over >> from standard AT&T DSL to U-verse. In the process, AT&T replaced the modem >> / router. The new unit that they issued does not have the ability to >> disable DHCP, which is necessary for this application as there is another >> DHCP server on the network. This is probably a fairly unique situation, as >> most routers that I've seen have the ability to disable DHCP, how the >> hardware manufacturer overlooked this is beyond me. Any suggestions on >> work-arounds? I had thought about putting a Mikrotik (or other router) in >> between their switch and the AT&T box and just doing double-nat, but wanted >> to see if there was a better way. TIA. >> >> -Jason >> >
