Wait, Rodman is a Mormon?  I thought he was fined $50K for insulting Mormons 
back in the day.

I was kind of hoping he would stay over in N. Korea with his buddy Un, the only 
person on the planet who thinks of him as a basketball player, not a washed up 
buffoon.  But N. Korea is stuck in 1950, so the Worm must seem like a 
basketball star from 45 years in the future.  I still can’t believe that idiot 
was on the same team with MJ.


From: Chuck McCown via Af 
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 6:23 PM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT: Question on the Sony Hack

Depends on the Mormon, I prefer peyote, 3D HiFi visions, ping time to heaven is 
in the nanoseconds...
From: Jason Petrillo via Af 
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 5:08 PM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT: Question on the Sony Hack

Chuck,

              I didn’t think Mormons drank…

 

J

 

 

Jason

 

 

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown via Af
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 3:44 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT: Question on the Sony Hack

 

I heard that Rev Al and Dennis Rodman shot a porno flick with Kim Jong Un and 
then he got wet feet during post production and sent Dennis and Rev Al into 
Sony HQ to delete the copy.  While the worm was attempting to guess the Sony 
root password (123456) they got drunk and ACCIDENTALLY shared some files with 
the rest of  the world.  They are sorry and Kim Jong is not returning their 
calls anymore.   So it is a big mistake, nothing to see here.  Please move 
along.  

 

From: That One Guy via Af 

Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 11:38 AM

To: af@afmug.com 

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT: Question on the Sony Hack

 

The two big problems with the tinfoil theories like that and the ones I come up 
with as well are the domestic terrorism issue, that wont go away, somebody will 
end up dead. The other is Al Sharpton, nobody, for any reason under the sun 
would open that can.

 

On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Nate Burke via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote: 

  Ok, putting on my Conspiracy theory hat now that the FBI just announced that 
NK is behind the attack, since there's been no collusion between the gov't and 
the media industry before.....  What if Sony is developing a new Distribution 
system to bypass theaters with new releases.  What better way to get it started 
than to have to use it in a way that does not anger theater owners.  'Oh, we 
have to distribute the movie this way, because someone threatened you if we 
show it at your movie theater'  And then, if it completely fails, they can 
point their finger to North Korea who 'Forced them to have to do it this way'  
They get to try something new without having ANYONE upset with them.  Oh, 
except maybe Seth Rogan.

  Were there any recent Sony Internships that touted 'International travel' as 
part of the perks?



  On 12/17/2014 8:39 PM, Mathew Howard via Af wrote:

    True... it's not really surprising they pulled it, nobody is going to want 
to take on that sort of liability.
     


----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    From: Af [af-boun...@afmug.com] on behalf of That One Guy via Af 
[af@afmug.com]
    Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 8:34 PM
    To: af@afmug.com
    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT: Question on the Sony Hack

    If hackers are involved to the degree they claim, which I doubt, the 
mystery of N Koreas involvment (they do have the money to pay for hired 
hackers) has emboldened them to act like warriors. 

    Sony already has 2 lawsuits going, for not protecting employee data, 
imagine if something did happen at a theater, even a random lunatic with a 9mm, 
thats alot of liability.

     

    A "leak" of the movie would be great, they can make their money on DMCA 
suits

     

     

    On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Mathew Howard via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote: 

      It seems a little odd that a bunch of hackers would even threaten that... 
I would think a more hacker-ish threat would be more credible.
       


--------------------------------------------------------------------------

      From: Af [af-boun...@afmug.com] on behalf of Jason McKemie via Af 
[af@afmug.com]
      Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 8:19 PM
      To: af@afmug.com
      Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT: Question on the Sony Hack

      How much of a physical violence threat are a bunch of hackers though? Not 
the most threatening demographic from that standpoint...

      On Wednesday, December 17, 2014, Tushar Patel via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote:

        I was thinking on same line but I am sure they must have got some 
credible threat to act like this.

        Tushar 

         


        On Dec 17, 2014, at 7:28 PM, Jason McKemie via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote:

          On a side note, I can't believe movie theaters as well as Sony 
capitulated to these dumbasses in regards to "The Interview".  Isn't that 
tantamount to negotiating with a terrorist?

          On Wednesday, December 17, 2014, Nate Burke via Af <af@afmug.com> 
wrote:

            I've only been following loosely with what I hear on the radio, but 
it sound like there was a lot of data stolen (multiple gig's from the sound of 
it).  The Last update I heard was that the hack originated from a hotel Wifi 
connection in china somewhere.  How were they able to transfer that much data 
in a short enough time that it wasn't discovered and stopped?  Did the hotel 
have a blazing fast network?  Something with getting that amount of data in 
such a short time dosen't seem to add up.

     

     

    -- 

    All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the 
parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you can't 
get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not use a 
hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925

   

 

 

-- 

All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the parts 
you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you can't get them 
together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not use a hammer. -- 
IBM maintenance manual, 1925

Reply via email to