*ouch*
That sounds painful :/
josh reynolds :: chief information officer
spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com
On 01/05/2015 12:31 PM, That One Guy wrote:
no, its got to do with prepping to move an entirely bridged network to
routed, then having the funding for the routers cut out from under you,
sore subject, but it is what it is and it works.
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
wrote:
Kim poops!!! It's true!!!
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
I just watched an old PBS Frontline about No. Korea last night.
“The Interview” must have gotten all their info from that episode.
Including the bit about Kim Jong Un not pooping. Cracked me up.
*From:* Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net>
*Sent:* Monday, January 05, 2015 2:20 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Secondary IP port assignment limits
Honeypots?
Or if you saw The Interview... Honeydicks are also a thing.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
<https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
------------------------------
*From: *"Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com>
*To: *af@afmug.com
*Sent: *Monday, January 5, 2015 3:19:24 PM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Secondary IP port assignment limits
I can not imagine what circumstance would require something like that.
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 11:09 AM, That One Guy <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
wrote:
lol, no the fortigate limit of 25. I have 94 to put on an interface
right now
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Josh Luthman <
j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
More than 255 addresses on ONE interface?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:59 PM, That One Guy <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com
wrote:
This is a transition on this particular project, moving all the IPs
from a powercode BMU to an intermediary router, but some of our sites could
easily exceed this number.
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Josh Luthman <
j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
255 until 2.2 kernel which is like a bazillion. I'm sure MT is using
a later version of the kernel.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com>
wrote:
I've never done 20, but I also don't know what it would be. Usually
when we are doing more than a couple, it is a transition kind of thing
while we are preparing a new link or something.
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 10:23 AM, That One Guy <
thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
We recently found that our Fortigates have a limit to the number of
IPs you can assign to a single interface, pretty low at 20 something. We
havent found a limit in the Imagestreams.
Is there a limit on Mikrotik?
--
All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember
that the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if
you can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do
not use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925
--
--
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
--
All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that
the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you
can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not
use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925
--
All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that
the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you
can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not
use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925
--
--
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
