Kim poops!!! It's true!!!
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > I just watched an old PBS Frontline about No. Korea last night. > “The Interview” must have gotten all their info from that episode. > Including the bit about Kim Jong Un not pooping. Cracked me up. > > *From:* Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> > *Sent:* Monday, January 05, 2015 2:20 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Secondary IP port assignment limits > > Honeypots? > > Or if you saw The Interview... Honeydicks are also a thing. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com> > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Monday, January 5, 2015 3:19:24 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Secondary IP port assignment limits > > I can not imagine what circumstance would require something like that. > > On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 11:09 AM, That One Guy <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> lol, no the fortigate limit of 25. I have 94 to put on an interface right >> now >> >> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com >> > wrote: >> >>> More than 255 addresses on ONE interface? >>> >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:59 PM, That One Guy <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> This is a transition on this particular project, moving all the IPs >>>> from a powercode BMU to an intermediary router, but some of our sites could >>>> easily exceed this number. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Josh Luthman < >>>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> 255 until 2.2 kernel which is like a bazillion. I'm sure MT is using >>>>> a later version of the kernel. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I've never done 20, but I also don't know what it would be. Usually >>>>>> when we are doing more than a couple, it is a transition kind of thing >>>>>> while we are preparing a new link or something. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 10:23 AM, That One Guy < >>>>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> We recently found that our Fortigates have a limit to the number of >>>>>>> IPs you can assign to a single interface, pretty low at 20 something. We >>>>>>> havent found a limit in the Imagestreams. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is there a limit on Mikrotik? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember >>>>>>> that the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. >>>>>>> Therefore, if >>>>>>> you can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all >>>>>>> means, do >>>>>>> not use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925 >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> -- >>>>>> bp >>>>>> part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that >>>> the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you >>>> can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not >>>> use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925 >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that >> the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you >> can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not >> use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925 >> > > > > -- > -- > bp > part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com > >
