Not usually – as the OMT or Coupler won’t match the radios.  You could do it 
with waveguide though… 

 




Daniel White | Managing Director

SAF North America LLC


 

Cell:

 

(303) 746-3590


Skype:

danieldwhite


E-mail:

 <mailto:daniel.wh...@saftehnika.com> daniel.wh...@saftehnika.com 

 

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 3:17 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 6 or 11ghz best option for higher capacity ?

 

Can one put on a combiner and a different brand radio as to have moar 
throughput?



-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

 

  _____  

From: "TJ Trout" <t...@voltbb.com <mailto:t...@voltbb.com> >
To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> 
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 4:09:46 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 6 or 11ghz best option for higher capacity ?

Mike;

 

Integra not available in 6 or 11, when they are it's only 100 meg jump in 
performance from the lumina...

 

I'll checkout trango and maybe alcoma. Sounds like the IP20c is where it's at 
but I'm assuming they are 40K?

 

On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 2:01 PM, TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com 
<mailto:t...@voltbb.com> > wrote:

What's the HP high power? What's the cost on that bad boy?

 

On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Jon Langeler <jon-ispli...@michwave.net 
<mailto:jon-ispli...@michwave.net> > wrote:

IP20C HP. Get a new FCC license :) You'll have another polarity to use later or 
in another direction.

 

Jon

Sent from my iPhone


On Jan 16, 2015, at 4:48 PM, TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com <mailto:t...@voltbb.com> 
> wrote:

What is my least expensive option for getting  more bandwidth in 6ghz or 11ghz 
? Right now I have 366mbps (56mhz 256qam) would like double or better?

 

On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Jon Langeler <jon-ispli...@michwave.net 
<mailto:jon-ispli...@michwave.net> > wrote:

compression yields a lot at 64byte packet, but yields much less at 256byte and 
larger...it's a curve. 

 

Also if your upgrading a long 5GHz link with 6Ghz, you'll probably be slightly 
better off even if the calcs say 'low uptime'. 11GHz will 'swing' during rains 
more than 6GHz obviously so the higher gain from the same size dishes helps 
there. Licensing a wide single polarity is always cheapest...

 

-Jon

 

Sent from my iPhone


On Jan 16, 2015, at 3:13 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com 
<mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> > wrote:

That sounds backwards.  Why would smaller packets net you greater throughput?




 

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340> 
Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343> 
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

 

On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Jeremy <jeremysmi...@gmail.com 
<mailto:jeremysmi...@gmail.com> > wrote:

It's really 60.  Ours does 1.4Gbps, 700Mbps full duplex (if every packet was a 
VoIP packet)...500Mbps FDX is a more realistic real-world TCP throughput that 
you can expect.

 

On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Hardy, Tim <tha...@comsearch.com 
<mailto:tha...@comsearch.com> > wrote:

It’s really 60!

 


60 MHz 


CH

N(

G(


1

5960.0250

6212.0650


2

6019.3250

6271.3650


3

6078.6250

6330.6650


4

6137.9250

6389.9650

 

As far as XPIC on 30 MHz vs. 60 MHz it all depends on the environment.  If 
x-pol is needed to clear a channel, it isn’t going to be available on the 
orthogonal polarization. 

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com> ] On Behalf 
Of Ken Hohhof
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 2:59 PM


To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 6 or 11ghz best option for higher capacity ?

 

In 6 GHz, is 60 really 60, or is it 30+30 contiguous?

 

I’m thinking it might be easier to do XPIC on the same 30 MHz channel than to 
find 60 MHz of available spectrum, but I haven’t done anything in 6 GHz, mainly 
because of antenna size.  Yes the FCC did relax the antenna rules to allow down 
to a 3 ft dish, but realistically that won’t give you enough gain unless it’s a 
short link, especially given that 6 GHz is subject to multipath fades.  So 
bottom line I haven’t kept up with what you can do in 6 GHz, so I could easily 
be wrong or behind the times.

 

From: Mike Hammett <mailto:af...@ics-il.net>  

Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 1:24 PM

To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>  

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 6 or 11ghz best option for higher capacity ?

 

30 MHz in the 7 GHz band, 30 MHz in some 6 GHz, 60 MHz in the rest of 6 GHz...  
IIRC.



-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

 


  _____  


From: "Ken Hohhof" <af...@kwisp.com <mailto:af...@kwisp.com> >
To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> 
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 1:18:19 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 6 or 11ghz best option for higher capacity ?

I would first talk to your frequency coordinator about what FCC channel widths 
can be licensed in what bands.  I’m not sure 40 MHz channels exist in 6 GHz, 
and I believe you’ll find an 80 MHz channel width means you need to license 2 
adjacent channels.  There is no benefit to having a radio that does 80 MHz 
channels if that’s not what you license, other than maybe having consistent 
equipment across your network to simplify sparing.

 

 

From: TJ Trout <mailto:t...@voltbb.com>  

Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 1:05 PM

To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>  

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 6 or 11ghz best option for higher capacity ?

 

11ghz integra doesn't exist, and when it does in april it's just 60mhz! Should 
I even be considering a 60mhz radio? Seems like 80 is the way to go?

 

On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Gino Villarini <g...@aeronetpr.com 
<mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com> > wrote:

11 ghz integra

 

 

 

Gino A. Villarini

President

Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.

www.aeronetpr.com <http://www.aeronetpr.com>    

@aeronetpr

 

 

 

From: TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com <mailto:t...@voltbb.com> >
Reply-To: "af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> " <af@afmug.com 
<mailto:af@afmug.com> >
Date: Friday, January 16, 2015 at 2:57 PM
To: "af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> " <af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> >
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 6 or 11ghz best option for higher capacity ?

 

I guess what I'm interested in is what is the cheapest 6 or 11ghz 80mhz radio 
in terms of bits/hz or should I just use the lumina in 2+0?

On Jan 16, 2015 10:54 AM, "TJ Trout" <t...@voltbb.com <mailto:t...@voltbb.com> 
> wrote:

So I have a lumina on 11ghz 56mhz that I need to upgrade, what is the most 
economical option for more capacity ? Saf doesn't really have much besides 2+0 
right now (maybe that's my best option?) So I was thinking about trying another 
brand something with maybe 80mhz channels ? What are my options that won't cost 
an arm and a leg ?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reply via email to