Can one put on a combiner and a different brand radio as to have moar
throughput?
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"TJ Trout" <t...@voltbb.com>
*To: *af@afmug.com
*Sent: *Friday, January 16, 2015 4:09:46 PM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] 6 or 11ghz best option for higher capacity ?
Mike;
Integra not available in 6 or 11, when they are it's only 100 meg jump
in performance from the lumina...
I'll checkout trango and maybe alcoma. Sounds like the IP20c is where
it's at but I'm assuming they are 40K?
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 2:01 PM, TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com
<mailto:t...@voltbb.com>> wrote:
What's the HP high power? What's the cost on that bad boy?
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Jon Langeler
<jon-ispli...@michwave.net <mailto:jon-ispli...@michwave.net>> wrote:
IP20C HP. Get a new FCC license :) You'll have another
polarity to use later or in another direction.
Jon
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 16, 2015, at 4:48 PM, TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com
<mailto:t...@voltbb.com>> wrote:
What is my least expensive option for getting more
bandwidth in 6ghz or 11ghz ? Right now I have 366mbps
(56mhz 256qam) would like double or better?
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Jon Langeler
<jon-ispli...@michwave.net
<mailto:jon-ispli...@michwave.net>> wrote:
compression yields a lot at 64byte packet, but yields
much less at 256byte and larger...it's a curve.
Also if your upgrading a long 5GHz link with 6Ghz,
you'll probably be slightly better off even if the
calcs say 'low uptime'. 11GHz will 'swing' during
rains more than 6GHz obviously so the higher gain from
the same size dishes helps there. Licensing a wide
single polarity is always cheapest...
-Jon
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 16, 2015, at 3:13 PM, Josh Luthman
<j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
<mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote:
That sounds backwards. Why would smaller packets
net you greater throughput?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Jeremy
<jeremysmi...@gmail.com
<mailto:jeremysmi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
It's really 60. Ours does 1.4Gbps, 700Mbps
full duplex (if every packet was a VoIP
packet)...500Mbps FDX is a more realistic
real-world TCP throughput that you can expect.
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Hardy, Tim
<tha...@comsearch.com
<mailto:tha...@comsearch.com>> wrote:
It’s really 60!
*60 MHz *
*CH*
*N(*
*G(*
1
5960.0250
6212.0650
2
6019.3250
6271.3650
3
6078.6250
6330.6650
4
6137.9250
6389.9650
As far as XPIC on 30 MHz vs. 60 MHz it all
depends on the environment. If x-pol is
needed to clear a channel, it isn’t going
to be available on the orthogonal
polarization.
*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com
<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On Behalf
Of *Ken Hohhof
*Sent:* Friday, January 16, 2015 2:59 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 6 or 11ghz best
option for higher capacity ?
In 6 GHz, is 60 really 60, or is it 30+30
contiguous?
I’m thinking it might be easier to do XPIC
on the same 30 MHz channel than to find 60
MHz of available spectrum, but I haven’t
done anything in 6 GHz, mainly because of
antenna size. Yes the FCC did relax the
antenna rules to allow down to a 3 ft
dish, but realistically that won’t give
you enough gain unless it’s a short link,
especially given that 6 GHz is subject to
multipath fades. So bottom line I haven’t
kept up with what you can do in 6 GHz, so
I could easily be wrong or behind the times.
*From:*Mike Hammett <mailto:af...@ics-il.net>
*Sent:*Friday, January 16, 2015 1:24 PM
*To:*af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] 6 or 11ghz best
option for higher capacity ?
30 MHz in the 7 GHz band, 30 MHz in some 6
GHz, 60 MHz in the rest of 6 GHz... IIRC.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"Ken Hohhof" <af...@kwisp.com
<mailto:af...@kwisp.com>>
*To: *af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Sent: *Friday, January 16, 2015 1:18:19 PM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] 6 or 11ghz best
option for higher capacity ?
I would first talk to your frequency
coordinator about what FCC channel widths
can be licensed in what bands. I’m not
sure 40 MHz channels exist in 6 GHz, and I
believe you’ll find an 80 MHz channel
width means you need to license 2 adjacent
channels. There is no benefit to having a
radio that does 80 MHz channels if that’s
not what you license, other than maybe
having consistent equipment across your
network to simplify sparing.
*From:*TJ Trout <mailto:t...@voltbb.com>
*Sent:*Friday, January 16, 2015 1:05 PM
*To:*af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] 6 or 11ghz best
option for higher capacity ?
11ghz integra doesn't exist, and when it
does in april it's just 60mhz! Should I
even be considering a 60mhz radio? Seems
like 80 is the way to go?
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Gino
Villarini <g...@aeronetpr.com
<mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com>> wrote:
11 ghz integra
Gino A. Villarini
President
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
www.aeronetpr.com <http://www.aeronetpr.com>
@aeronetpr
*From: *TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com
<mailto:t...@voltbb.com>>
*Reply-To: *"af@afmug.com
<mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com
<mailto:af@afmug.com>>
*Date: *Friday, January 16, 2015 at 2:57 PM
*To: *"af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>"
<af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>>
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] 6 or 11ghz best
option for higher capacity ?
I guess what I'm interested in is what is
the cheapest 6 or 11ghz 80mhz radio in
terms of bits/hz or should I just use the
lumina in 2+0?
On Jan 16, 2015 10:54 AM, "TJ Trout"
<t...@voltbb.com <mailto:t...@voltbb.com>> wrote:
So I have a lumina on 11ghz 56mhz that I
need to upgrade, what is the most
economical option for more capacity ? Saf
doesn't really have much besides 2+0 right
now (maybe that's my best option?) So I
was thinking about trying another brand
something with maybe 80mhz channels ? What
are my options that won't cost an arm and
a leg ?
