Maybe Charles was bought off to ward off a competitor?

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Jan 21, 2015 9:35 PM, "Mike Hammett" <af...@ics-il.net> wrote:

> That's the exact scenario that I posed and was avoided.
>
> CTI was definitely MemoryLink.
>
>
>
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
> ------------------------------
> *From: *"Jason McKemie" <j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com>
> *To: *af@afmug.com
> *Sent: *Wednesday, January 21, 2015 6:22:04 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter?
>
> It's also a strange "coincidence" that CTI's ptmp offering that could
> supposedly sync with Canopy disappeared and shortly thereafter ePMP came on
> the scene...
>
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Sriram Chaturvedi <
> sriram.chaturv...@cambiumnetworks.com> wrote:
>
>>  You can put that rumor to rest because it’s not true.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Josh Reynolds
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 21, 2015 5:30 PM
>> *To:* af@afmug.com; Jason McKemie
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter?
>>
>>
>>
>> That's a rumor I have heard as well.
>>
>> On January 21, 2015 2:27:58 PM AKST, Jason McKemie <
>> j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote:
>>
>>  It's probably because they didn't originally design ePMP, just
>> purchased it off of someone else (possibly Memorylink?)
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  I can only see two logical reasons that they didn't do that - either
>> it's significantly cheaper to build an antenna in the ePMP form factor, or
>> they purposely didn't want them to work too well with Canopy accessories...
>> presumably to encourage people to upgrade FSK networks to 450 instead.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Josh Luthman <
>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
>>
>>  So you mean epmp guts put into the case they used for FSK, 430 and
>> 450?  That would make way too much sense, though...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Gino Villarini <g...@aeronetpr.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>   Sorry, epmp unit with SM like features (bracket and patch)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Gino A. Villarini
>>
>> President
>>
>> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
>>
>> www.aeronetpr.com
>>
>> @aeronetpr
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
>> *Reply-To: *"af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
>> *Date: *Wednesday, January 21, 2015 at 7:13 PM
>> *To: *"af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter?
>>
>>
>>
>> What do you mean put in "epmp like unit"?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Gino Villarini <g...@aeronetpr.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>   Josh, you are missing the whole point… I know this, but that combo
>> dosnt yield good gain… maybe 15-16db total gain at best… also you need
>> special adapters for it to work.
>>
>>
>>
>> We need a direct replacement, remove SM, put Epmp like unit
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Gino A. Villarini
>>
>> President
>>
>> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
>>
>> www.aeronetpr.com
>>
>> @aeronetpr
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
>> *Reply-To: *"af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
>> *Date: *Wednesday, January 21, 2015 at 7:00 PM
>> *To: *"af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter?
>>
>>
>>
>> Dude you can use the 27rd or KP reflectors with EPMP.  I believe the
>> force 110 is better gain though.
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> On Jan 21, 2015 5:12 PM, "Gino Villarini" <g...@aeronetpr.com> wrote:
>>
>> no
>>
>>
>>
>> Gino A. Villarini
>> President
>> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
>> www.aeronetpr.com
>> @aeronetpr
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 1/21/15, 3:00 PM, "John Woodfield" <john.woodfi...@jwcn.biz> wrote:
>>
>> >Can't you use an epmp integrates on the 100 dish???
>> >
>> >Sent from my iPhone
>> >
>> >> On Jan 21, 2015, at 1:51 PM, Gino Villarini <g...@aeronetpr.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> So we are migrating some our Canopy 100 to epmpŠ primarily using the
>> >>Force110Š but I ponder, 99% of my PMP100 installs have dishesŠ
>> >>
>> >> Why cambium or anyone else has developed a simple bracket with a dual
>> >>pol patch so we can put a conn. Epmp there and just swap a Canopy SM
>> >>with this contraption????
>> >>
>> >> My techs could do a swap in 5 minutes instead of 30-45 min
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Gino A. Villarini
>> >> President
>> >> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
>> >> www.aeronetpr.com
>> >> @aeronetpr
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>>
>
>
>

Reply via email to