Sri, Slow on my tablet and phone as well. I feel it should be faster on my PC and laptop.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Jan 21, 2015 10:07 PM, "Sriram Chaturvedi" < [email protected]> wrote: > Its great that you like the PMP100 platform. > > > If by bloated software, you mean Nate's GUI load time, we're actively > investigating that with some information we got from Nate offline. > > > For PTP applications, you should be able to use max power. Please hit me > up offline as well if you'd like to discuss specific scenarios. > > > Thanks, > > Sriram > ------------------------------ > *From:* Af <[email protected]> on behalf of John Woodfield < > [email protected]> > *Sent:* Wednesday, January 21, 2015 9:00 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter? > > > So how about fixing the bloated software? The old pmp100 software was > great comparatively. Also, how about a EIRP fix so we can turn the power up > in ptp applications or turn up if using a low gain antenna? > > > > > > > > John Woodfield Delmarva WiFi http://www.delmarvawifi.com cell (410) > 708-1937 > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Sriram Chaturvedi" <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 9:55pm > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter? > > > > Wow. I stepped away for a couple of hours and this escalated pretty > quickly. > > > > Mike - It certainly wasn't me that you talked to although it doesn't seem > to matter what I say. Something about governments, companies and stuff and > some folks wanting design documents. But you are right, ePMP is something > where we see it as an opportunity to do things differently. We make > mistakes no doubt but at least we know we tried and fix it as quickly as > possible. > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Af <[email protected]> on behalf of Mike Hammett < > [email protected]> > *Sent:* Wednesday, January 21, 2015 8:33 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter? > > I specifically asked Cambium staff face to face on at least three > occasions about it and it was avoided. It wasn't until I was at the office > in September that they put it to rest. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Sriram Chaturvedi" <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Wednesday, January 21, 2015 6:16:27 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter? > > Really? First time I'm hearing this and I've been on this list > for a while. I must've missed it. > > > > I will tell you now that ePMP was designed and built in Cambium. Hope that > clears up any confusion. > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Af <[email protected]> on behalf of Tyler Treat < > [email protected]> > *Sent:* Wednesday, January 21, 2015 6:11 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter? > > I think everyone assumed epmp = further refined MemoryLink... At least > initially. > > ___________________________ > Mangled by my iPhone. > ___________________________ > Tyler Treat > Corn Belt Technologies, Inc. > [email protected] > ___________________________ > > On Jan 21, 2015, at 5:58 PM, Sriram Chaturvedi < > [email protected]> wrote: > > You can put that rumor to rest because it’s not true. > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *Josh Reynolds > *Sent:* Wednesday, January 21, 2015 5:30 PM > *To:* [email protected]; Jason McKemie > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter? > > > > That's a rumor I have heard as well. > > On January 21, 2015 2:27:58 PM AKST, Jason McKemie < > [email protected]> wrote: > > It's probably because they didn't originally design ePMP, just purchased > it off of someone else (possibly Memorylink?) > > > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I can only see two logical reasons that they didn't do that - either > it's significantly cheaper to build an antenna in the ePMP form factor, or > they purposely didn't want them to work too well with Canopy accessories... > presumably to encourage people to upgrade FSK networks to 450 instead. > > > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> > wrote: > > So you mean epmp guts put into the case they used for FSK, 430 and 450? > That would make way too much sense, though... > > > > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Gino Villarini <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sorry, epmp unit with SM like features (bracket and patch) > > > > > > > > Gino A. Villarini > > President > > Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. > > www.aeronetpr.com > > @aeronetpr > > > > > > > > *From: *Josh Luthman <[email protected]> > *Reply-To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]> > *Date: *Wednesday, January 21, 2015 at 7:13 PM > *To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]> > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter? > > > > What do you mean put in "epmp like unit"? > > > > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Gino Villarini <[email protected]> wrote: > > Josh, you are missing the whole point… I know this, but that combo > dosnt yield good gain… maybe 15-16db total gain at best… also you need > special adapters for it to work. > > > > We need a direct replacement, remove SM, put Epmp like unit > > > > > > > > Gino A. Villarini > > President > > Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. > > www.aeronetpr.com > > @aeronetpr > > > > > > > > *From: *Josh Luthman <[email protected]> > *Reply-To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]> > *Date: *Wednesday, January 21, 2015 at 7:00 PM > *To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]> > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter? > > > > Dude you can use the 27rd or KP reflectors with EPMP. I believe the force > 110 is better gain though. > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Jan 21, 2015 5:12 PM, "Gino Villarini" <[email protected]> wrote: > > no > > > > Gino A. Villarini > President > Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. > www.aeronetpr.com > @aeronetpr > > > > > > > On 1/21/15, 3:00 PM, "John Woodfield" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >Can't you use an epmp integrates on the 100 dish??? > > > >Sent from my iPhone > > > >> On Jan 21, 2015, at 1:51 PM, Gino Villarini <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> So we are migrating some our Canopy 100 to epmpŠ primarily using the > >>Force110Š but I ponder, 99% of my PMP100 installs have dishesŠ > >> > >> Why cambium or anyone else has developed a simple bracket with a dual > >>pol patch so we can put a conn. Epmp there and just swap a Canopy SM > >>with this contraption???? > >> > >> My techs could do a swap in 5 minutes instead of 30-45 min > >> > >> > >> > >> Gino A. Villarini > >> President > >> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. > >> www.aeronetpr.com > >> @aeronetpr > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. > >
