This, and a subsequent NDA is about the only other thing that makes any sense. Kind of.
On Wednesday, January 21, 2015, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> wrote: > Maybe Charles was bought off to ward off a competitor? > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > On Jan 21, 2015 9:35 PM, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > >> That's the exact scenario that I posed and was avoided. >> >> CTI was definitely MemoryLink. >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *"Jason McKemie" <[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> >> *To: *[email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >> *Sent: *Wednesday, January 21, 2015 6:22:04 PM >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter? >> >> It's also a strange "coincidence" that CTI's ptmp offering that could >> supposedly sync with Canopy disappeared and shortly thereafter ePMP came on >> the scene... >> >> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Sriram Chaturvedi < >> [email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> >> wrote: >> >>> You can put that rumor to rest because it’s not true. >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>] *On Behalf Of *Josh >>> Reynolds >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 21, 2015 5:30 PM >>> *To:* [email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>; >>> Jason McKemie >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter? >>> >>> >>> >>> That's a rumor I have heard as well. >>> >>> On January 21, 2015 2:27:58 PM AKST, Jason McKemie < >>> [email protected] >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> It's probably because they didn't originally design ePMP, just >>> purchased it off of someone else (possibly Memorylink?) >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected] >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >>> >>> I can only see two logical reasons that they didn't do that - either >>> it's significantly cheaper to build an antenna in the ePMP form factor, or >>> they purposely didn't want them to work too well with Canopy accessories... >>> presumably to encourage people to upgrade FSK networks to 450 instead. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Josh Luthman < >>> [email protected] >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >>> >>> So you mean epmp guts put into the case they used for FSK, 430 and >>> 450? That would make way too much sense, though... >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Gino Villarini <[email protected] >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >>> >>> Sorry, epmp unit with SM like features (bracket and patch) >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Gino A. Villarini >>> >>> President >>> >>> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. >>> >>> www.aeronetpr.com >>> >>> @aeronetpr >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *From: *Josh Luthman <[email protected] >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> >>> *Reply-To: *"[email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>" >>> <[email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> >>> *Date: *Wednesday, January 21, 2015 at 7:13 PM >>> *To: *"[email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>" < >>> [email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> >>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter? >>> >>> >>> >>> What do you mean put in "epmp like unit"? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Gino Villarini <[email protected] >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >>> >>> Josh, you are missing the whole point… I know this, but that combo >>> dosnt yield good gain… maybe 15-16db total gain at best… also you need >>> special adapters for it to work. >>> >>> >>> >>> We need a direct replacement, remove SM, put Epmp like unit >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Gino A. Villarini >>> >>> President >>> >>> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. >>> >>> www.aeronetpr.com >>> >>> @aeronetpr >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *From: *Josh Luthman <[email protected] >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> >>> *Reply-To: *"[email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>" >>> <[email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> >>> *Date: *Wednesday, January 21, 2015 at 7:00 PM >>> *To: *"[email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>" < >>> [email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> >>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter? >>> >>> >>> >>> Dude you can use the 27rd or KP reflectors with EPMP. I believe the >>> force 110 is better gain though. >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> On Jan 21, 2015 5:12 PM, "Gino Villarini" <[email protected] >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >>> >>> no >>> >>> >>> >>> Gino A. Villarini >>> President >>> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. >>> www.aeronetpr.com >>> @aeronetpr >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 1/21/15, 3:00 PM, "John Woodfield" <[email protected] >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >>> >>> >Can't you use an epmp integrates on the 100 dish??? >>> > >>> >Sent from my iPhone >>> > >>> >> On Jan 21, 2015, at 1:51 PM, Gino Villarini <[email protected] >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> So we are migrating some our Canopy 100 to epmpŠ primarily using the >>> >>Force110Š but I ponder, 99% of my PMP100 installs have dishesŠ >>> >> >>> >> Why cambium or anyone else has developed a simple bracket with a dual >>> >>pol patch so we can put a conn. Epmp there and just swap a Canopy SM >>> >>with this contraption???? >>> >> >>> >> My techs could do a swap in 5 minutes instead of 30-45 min >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Gino A. Villarini >>> >> President >>> >> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. >>> >> www.aeronetpr.com >>> >> @aeronetpr >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. >>> >> >> >>
