A 300gb cap with a fee thereafter (or reduced speed) is not what I would consider UBB (maybe hybrid UBB). Also, upfront is good in theory, but most people won't ever even make it to the "cap" - IMO, they'll see your "limit" and not your competitor's, thus putting you at a disadvantage.
On Wednesday, February 11, 2015, Jeremy <jeremysmi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Who are you competing against? We have Century Link, Comcast, and Digis > as our main competitors....all of which have a 'Abuse Policy' that has > limits hidden in it. We are just upfront about it. 300GB per month, 50 > cents per GB thereafter. Simple. Use SlingBox to your hearts content...up > to 300GB. > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 10:13 PM, Jason McKemie < > j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com');>> wrote: > >> That's not a solution if it makes you non-competitive. >> >> On Wednesday, February 11, 2015, Jeremy <jeremysmi...@gmail.com >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jeremysmi...@gmail.com');>> wrote: >> >>> The solution is easy. Usage Based Billing. Unlimited is nuts for a >>> WISP, unless you have the spectrum to put 8 people per Access Point... >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Seth Mattinen <se...@rollernet.us> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2/11/15 9:20, Brett A Mansfield wrote: >>>> >>>>> It may be legal, but why should I be required to provide someone >>>>> access to a paid service without getting anything from it? >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> The customer pays you for internet access, right? That's what you "get" >>>> from it. >>>> >>>> ~Seth >>>> >>> >>> >
