I haven't used them, but there could still be frame size issues or other protocol issues by having an active device in the middle. I think CE (not widely adopted in the WISP market due to MT not supporting it) requires every active device to be CE. I think, not certain.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Keefe John" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2015 1:54:16 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Netonix switch You could setup a VLAN on two ports on the switch so essentially the netonix switch is just a mid-span POE for the airfiber. On 2/15/2015 1:44 PM, Craig House wrote: > Can you manage traffic across the air fiber backhaul port and brought it to > another switch port so that you may plug it directly into a router as opposed > to the network being bridged? > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Feb 15, 2015, at 13:12, Keefe John <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> They are awesome. We are replacing all of our cisco and ubnt toughswitches >> with netonix switches. The fact that they can power airfibers and some >> microwave radios is great too. They also have way more port statistics that >> a toughswitch so you can better troubleshoot issues. >> >>> On 2/14/2015 9:41 PM, Craig House wrote: >>> Who is using them? Better than UBNT Toughswitch? Are the ports all both 24 >>> or 48v like the tough switch and can they be turned on / off for POE or are >>> they on POE all the time? >>> >>> thanks >>> Craig
